Phil Twyford, now Housing Minister, supported the push for change in Kaye's 'apartment blues' report when he was in Opposition.
Collins and Kaye said refined governance, management and planning structure would lead to more quality housing through improved long-term maintenance plans and boost the confidence of first-time buyers.
Kaye worked for years with property and legal experts and produced a report for the last National government.
A discussion paper was subsequently released which formed the basis of the law change.
Areas to be reformed are:
• Improving the information disclosure regime to prospective buyers of units;
• Strengthening the governance arrangements of the body corporate, the entity responsible for the management and operation of a unit title complex;
• Increasing the professionalism and standards of body corporate managers;
• Ensuring that planning and funding of long-term maintenance projects was adequate and proportionate to the size of the complex concerned;
• Providing the ability to opt out of some requirements for smaller buildings such as requirements around long term maintenance plans;
• Reducing proxy farming by setting a maximum of proxy votes at 5 per cent;
• Clarifying requirements around the existing 25 per cent quorum for general meetings;
• Enabling the flexibility to apportion utility costs based on use.
Joanna Pidgeon, Auckland District Law Society president, said her organisation supported the MPs.
"This reform has been led by key players in the industry forming the working group proposing changes which has led to the proposed Bill. We see the problems with disclosure and poor governance for purchasers and owners every day," she said.
"With the greater intensification of cities such as Auckland it is essential that our legislation is amended to address these key concerns to improve transparency and effectiveness of bodies corporate without delay."
Lyn Gillingham, Auckland branch chairwoman and national president of the body Corporate Chairs Group, also supports the need for reform.
"We are frequently contacted by members who struggle with outcomes created through some of the loopholes in governance matters that are possible under the present legislative structure," she said.
"Greater certainty is required to enable the huge growth in multi-owned developments to proceed smoothly – a failure to close the loopholes will see future generations reluctant to adopt this important lifestyle residential choice."