Cornege accused Bryers of contrivance in his role as a strategic consultant to Australian company, Talos Accounting Group, when he was, in fact, pulling the strings in the background and playing a managerial role.
Bryers denied the accusation and had the support of two witnesses and long-time associates Lawrence Eakin and Robert Hughes. Eakin is a former executive director of Northern Crest (formerly Blue Chip) and both men have been involved in running Talos.
Cornege said Bryers' behaviour in Australia didn't amount to a breach of New Zealand law because it fell outside of the Official Assignee's jurisdiction. But he said it was a potential breach of Australia's Corporations Act which stops undischarged bankrupts from any country managing corporations or making or participating in decisions that affect the whole or a substantial part of a corporation.
Bryers had permission from the Official Assignee to live in Australia where he's been since 2007.
Cornege said it was up to the Australian Securities and Investment Commission to decide whether to pursue action over the potential breach but said Bryers' conduct should be taken into consideration by the court, either in terms of his potential post-adjudication conduct or in terms of his commercial morality.
Chisholm said Bryers had served longer than he should have because the Official Assignee had "sat on his hands" for two years in calling a public examination. That's despite Bryers crossing the Tasman several times at the assignee's request.
Chisholm said the Official Assignee had also failed to produce sworn evidence that proved Bryers was more than a consultant to Talos.
He said while there was concern Bryers could put the New Zealand business community at risk if discharged, he argued most people had heard of him and would make their own decisions on doing business with him.