The closure of Rio Tinto's Tiwai Point aluminium smelter will suck more than $400 million out of the Southland economy. Photo / Nick Unkovich
The closure of Rio Tinto's Tiwai Point aluminium smelter will suck more than $400 million out of the Southland economy. Photo / Nick Unkovich
Opinion
COMMENT:
The 2600 jobs to be sacrificed in Southland next year are a high price to pay for confused energy policy and a multi-decade decline in this country's economic ambitions.
Despite the writing being on the wall for the Tiwai Point smelter since 2013, the plant – one of theworld's lowest-carbon aluminium producers – will close next year with no apparent plan on alternative uses for the 5000 gigawatt-hours of renewable electricity its closure will release.
Only about half that supply can be squeezed onto the national grid any time soon. And such is the mistrust of operator Rio Tinto that we don't even know what the process and timetable for shutting the smelter is; in seven years, no one in government has ever bothered to ask.
Other countries would kill for the abundant hydro and wind resources of Southland. Yet in New Zealand, where successive National and Labour governments have spouted piously about the long-term advantage renewables will give this country's exporters, or the new firms that will be queuing to set up business here, we simply turn our back on them.
Rather than apply the smelter's current 572-megawatt supply to build new industries, the best we can imagine is to reward ourselves with lower power prices – for a few years. We pretend the bounty of an over-supplied power market will speed the uptake of electric vehicles – except we haven't bothered mobilising that technology either.
The smelter's closure will suck more than $400 million out of the Southland economy and damage thousands of families.
All the government could offer last week was support for new industries like aquaculture – which doesn't use a lot of power – hydrogen, the government's default answer to all things energy related – and data centres, which employ very few people.
Interestingly, two data centres will open in Auckland in 2022. Their combined load will be just 20 MW.
EV enthusiast and ChargeSmart chief executive Nigel Broomhall is right to tout Tiwai Point as a potential location for a global scale EV battery "gigafactory", but those talks should have begun two years ago.
Tiwai Point smelter will close next year. Photo / Gregor Richardson
The harsh lesson from the smelter's experience with renewably produced aluminium is that, although some consumer goods can already attract a premium based on their sustainability and a low-carbon footprint, many will not and few if any commodity products will. The latter must still compete on cost.
As a nation we have tried to move out of the commodity game and in the past 20 years we have developed global technology plays in everything from film-making to healthcare and space flight.
We have had some success encouraging more high-tech manufacturing - but done little to really drive it – and during the pandemic we casually shut it all down as non-essential to the economy.
At the same time we have allowed other heavy industry, like wood processing and steel making, to atrophy, despite our ongoing domestic demand for those products and the high-paying jobs and skills training they provide.
Even in areas like geothermal and wind energy – where we had a global edge over many players – we have sat back and let others muscle in or overtake us in fields that are no longer niche.
We showed no enthusiasm when the UK government wanted to partner in a marine energy test centre here; officials were disdainful of efforts to offer internationally our then-unique skills in integrating renewables into fledgling electricity grids; and Iceland is now offering geothermal development advice in our Asia-Pacific backyard.
In a world that is crying out for natural gas – to replace high-emitting coal – we have opted to halt offshore exploration.
Talk about the potential to develop "green-tech" minerals like lithium and cobalt has not been matched by action.
And while we advance modest hydrogen trials here, state and federal agencies in near-neighbour Australia have committed about A$400m ($427m) to date; Germany has earmarked €9 billion for hydrogen as part of its Covid-recovery plan, in addition to other European Union funding.
As Andrew Clennett, chief executive of local hydrogen developer Hiringa Energy said last month, "other countries have stopped talking about it and are doing it".
Governments can't magic up businesses and industries. But they can easily stop them, sometimes gradually and unwittingly.
If renewable energy is such a compelling attraction, where are all these businesses?
If it is that easy, why is China's Guangxi Fenglin Wood Industry Group now in its third attempt in six years to get an investment under way here?
Is the renewable energy bounty a myth of our own making? Or is it that no large-scale manufacturer would want to establish a business in a country where governments have proven fickle supporters and where it may take five years to get a resource consent?
And if that manufacturer is an energy-intensive exporter, how comfortable would it be after Finance Minister Grant Robertson last week casually dismissed as "subsidies" the necessary protections available for exporters under our emissions trading scheme?
Former smelter general manager Tom Campbell is right to be angry about the lack of commercial common sense the parties in the smelter dispute have shown.
Rio Tinto's reckless demand for a $30m Crown pay-out in 2013 – to ease the path for the listing of Meridian Energy – poisoned an already difficult relationship. Government-owned Transpower has shown remarkable intransigence in refusing to cap the smelter's rising and obviously unfair transmission obligations.
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern will visit Southland tomorrow, but don't expect much useful from the Crown cheque book.
Perhaps while half the Cabinet is in the Deep South offering soothing words of comfort and regret, someone at Treasury could give Rio Tinto a ring and find out what the timeframes are for dismantling the smelter.
And maybe someone could give some thought as to how one of the country's largest consented industrial sites could remain just that, before Transpower starts ripping down its lines, before the port infrastructure is dismantled, and before the Department of Conservation tries to add it to its already generous South Island estate.
