The punishment is disproportionate and is unlikely to actually act as a deterrent.
Termination sets a bad precedent and even the United Nations has declared internet access a human right and criticised "three strikes" laws like New Zealand's which may see users lose access for repeat infringements. In a recent report UN special rapporteur Frank La Rue said the internet had become, "a key means by which individuals can exercise their right to freedom of opinion and expression".
New Zealand is far behind the rest of the world in terms of our access to new material released on the conventional supply chain, and we often have to wait months, even years before we can get content that is freely available overseas.
We support Kiwi creatives and think encouraging greater legal content to be available online would be more effective than this law which makes it cheaper and faster for large, very-profitable corporate media companies to enforce their old distribution models.
We need the Government to encourage greater availability of legal file-sharing.
It was disturbing that Commerce Minister Simon Power, in answering my recent questions in Parliament, wasn't even aware of Netflix, the massively popular US legal media distribution system given his Government had invested thousands of hours and millions of dollars into trying to reduce online infringing.
Encouraging greater legal alternatives is the most effective thing we could do to support Kiwi artists.
If you need advice or have questions check out www.3strikes.net.nz