Fuji Xerox accused Pollard of serious misconduct by breaching internal policies and participating in inappropriate accounting practices in five client deals, being a key decision maker between April 2015 and June 2015 in amending a number of deals to avoid a material impact on revenue, approving a $305,000 overstatement of revenue in 2015, signing off on inflated target volumes, approving deals that led to significant losses, and failing to reimburse some $22,000 of overpaid commissions, and dismissed him after a disciplinary meeting in July 2017.
Pollard claims he was unjustifiably dismissed, saying there were "serious deficiencies in the process used by FXNZ to reach its conclusions that dismissal was an appropriate penalty" and didn't account for "the disparate treatment Mr Pollard received to Mr Whittaker and Mr (Mark) Allright (the former chief financial officer)," whose recommendations he said he'd followed in approving the deals. He claimed he'd been dismissed for decisions outside his control and a perceived close relationship with Whittaker.
"Mr Pollard says he was treated disparately from Mr Whittaker who was able to enter into an agreement with Fuji Japan to leave the organisation with a significant payout," the decision said. "He says he was the 'last man standing' and became a scapegoat given that both Mr Whittaker and Mr Allright had already left Fuji Xerox at the time the report was released."
Pollard said his reputation would be undermined if he wasn't returned on an interim basis and that as the sole earner he had to take out an overdraft to meet his bills.
That didn't sway Campbell, given Pollard had been identified in the scrutiny of the issue, which she said had probably "already tainted Mr Pollard's reputation" and that Fuji Xerox's lifting of a one-year restraint of working in the industry would mean he could seek alternative employment.