Lord only knows what everyone is doing online on their mobile phones. I know in our house Wikipedia is most frequently consulted, usually in the interests of petty point-scoring during an argument about some arcane matter of politics or musicology that seems to define everything wrong with our relationship at that particular point in time.
But apparently much more than de facto marriage umpiring by cellphone is possible. And where users go-eth, there follow-eth advertising. And so, for the first time ever this year, statistics on how much is spent on advertising in the country have included a small but still reasonably significant spend on mobile phone advertising.
There is only one way this spend will be going in the future: up. Even someone as consistently wrong as I am about trends can see that. In the United States, spending on mobile advertising is already in the billions, with more and more companies looking to exploit the space. According to mobile advertising experts Flurry.com, people currently spend about 23 per cent of their time on mobile devices, (second only to TV, at 40 per cent) but the medium only gets 1 per cent of ad spend - for now.
It's a little bit like the situation before online advertising took flight - explosive interest in the web, but for a long time there was little understanding of how to use it to reach the consumer. And judging by the number of pop-ups, flashing lights and uninspiring banner ads that remain, some might say many advertisers still don't.
Perhaps the more pressing question is, can we not just have one little corner of the digital world unsullied; untouched by the tentacle-like arms of advertising? Can we not just watch - in peace - an ad-free re-run of Shortland Street as we wait for the bus? Is there any way to avoid the Tui girls, the Beaurepaires guy, the toilet-paper covered puppy? Look at our digital history, and it's pretty clear the answer is a resounding no.