The stockpile is expected to include both rare earths and critical minerals as well as other strategically important elements that are subject to volatile prices.
It represents a major commitment to accumulate minerals deemed critical to the industrial economy - including the automotive, aerospace and energy sectors - and highlights Trump’s effort to wean US supply chains from China, the world’s dominant provider and processor of critical minerals.
The project has participation from more than a dozen companies so far, including General Motors Co., Stellantis NV, Boeing Co., Corning Inc., GE Vernova Inc. and Alphabet Inc.’s Google. Three commodities trading houses - Hartree Partners LP, Traxys North America LLC and Mercuria Energy Group Ltd. - have signed on to handle purchases of the raw materials to fill the stockpile.
The US already operates a national stockpile of critical minerals to serve the country’s defence-industrial base but doesn’t have a stockpile for civilian needs.
Under Trump, the US also has taken the rare step of investing directly in domestic minerals companies to boost the production and processing of rare earths at home.
The Administration has already inked co-operation agreements with Australia, Japan, Malaysia and other countries on the issue.
It will press even more nations to pursue such pacts during a summit of dozens of countries set to take place in Washington on Wednesday local time.
The effort to reduce risk in the mineral supply chain gained new momentum last year, after China tightened export controls on some materials.
That spurred some US manufacturers to dial back production and underscored the extent of Beijing’s leverage.
The new venture will offer participating manufacturers a way to insulate their businesses from swings in prices for key materials without having to maintain their own stockpiles.
Those types of swings can expose companies to massive volatility in key raw material inputs that wreak havoc on balance sheets. For example, nickel saw a historic price surge shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine, fed by fears buyers would no longer be able to purchase the metal from Russia, a top supplier.
Some details about Project Vault’s structure were not immediately known, including the institutional investors providing the US$1.67b.
The senior Administration officials said the project had been oversubscribed because investors are attracted by a credit-worthy group of manufacturers, their long-term commitments and the involvement of the US export-credit agency.
The specific carrying costs that would be charged to those manufacturers, as well as the fees for the trading firms participating as procurement officers, weren’t disclosed.
Under the arrangement, companies that make an initial commitment to purchase materials at a specified inventory price later - and pay some up-front fees - will be able to present Project Vault with a shopping list of preferred materials they need.
The project, in turn, will seek to procure and store the materials, with the manufacturers charged a carrying cost for the expenses associated with interest on the loan and holding the elements.
Manufacturers will be allowed to draw down their material stash as long as the firms replenish them. In the case of a major supply disruption, they will be able to access all of it, the officials said.
A key element in the venture’s design is that manufacturers who commit to buy a specified amount of materials at a set price also commit to repurchase the same amount at that same cost in the future. The Administration sees that acting as a stabilising mechanism, helping suppress volatility.
Sign up to Herald Premium Editor’s Picks, delivered straight to your inbox every Friday. Editor-in-Chief Murray Kirkness picks the week’s best features, interviews and investigations. Sign up for Herald Premium here.
