His Administration accuses European nations of taking advantage of American generosity and of failing to take responsibility for their own destiny.
The security strategy openly supports far-right European parties, questioning the continent’s commitment to peace and indicating that its security was no longer a top US priority.
But lawmakers are explicitly moving in the opposite direction - deepening US resources for the Baltic states and hardening Nato’s northeastern flank, in a move that amounts to one of the strongest congressional assertions in years of Europe’s strategic importance.
The 2026 National Defence Authorisation Act (NDAA) carries a robust US$8 billion ($13.7b) more than Trump requested in May, authorising roughly US$901b in defence spending.
It leans hard into European defence, barring troop levels on the continent from falling below 76,000 for more than 45 days and blocking the removal of major equipment.
Demand for drug-strike videos
The White House has backed the 3086-page bill, despite its misgivings over Europe - and a provision forcing the Pentagon to hand over videos of maritime strikes against suspected drug-smuggling vessels in Latin American waters.
The footage has become a flashpoint in a transparency dispute between congressional defence and security committees and the military.
To ensure compliance, lawmakers will withhold a quarter of Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth’s travel budget until the videos arrive - an unusually personal tactic reflecting frustration over slow document production and the Administration’s expanding use of lethal force in drug interdictions.
The NDAA also adds traditional security priorities. It places fresh limits on any reduction of the 28,500 US troops in South Korea, a signal to Seoul amid uncertainty over America’s long-term military commitment in East Asia.
With support from the Administration wavering, the Bill also doubles down on Ukraine - setting aside US$400 million in security assistance to sustain a baseline of support even if emergency funding stalls.
A group of conservative hardliners has explored blocking the NDAA over its inclusion of Ukraine assistance and the absence of a ban on a central bank digital currency.
But such grumbling is routine for a final NDAA, and there were few signs of a rebellion capable of sinking the policy package.
With bipartisan backing on Europe, South Korea, Ukraine and the war authorisation repeals, House passage is expected - though the Bill would then head to the Senate for further scrutiny.
-Agence France-Presse