Trump pushes false claims about migrants eating dogs in Springfield, Ohio

Former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during a presidential debate with US Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on September 10, 2024. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP)

Former president Donald Trump today doubled down on a false and dehumanising claim – pushed by his running mate and some Republicans – that immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, who came into the country during the Biden-Harris administration are injuring and eating Americans’ pets.

“In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs. The people that came in, they’re eating the cats. They’re eating – they’re eating the pets of the people that live there,” Trump said at the ABC News debate between him and Vice President Kamala Harris. “And this is what’s happening in our country. And it’s a shame.”

When moderator David Muir pushed back, saying that the city manager of Springfield has said there were no credible reports of such claims, Trump refused to concede.

“I’ve seen people on television … the people on television claimed ‘My dog was taken and used for food,” Trump said, interrupting Muir. “So maybe he said that, and maybe that’s a good thing to say for a city manager.”

The escalation of the baseless and bizarre assertion came a day after Senator JD Vance (R-Ohio), Trump’s running mate, shared a post on X in which he cited unnamed “reports” claiming that people in the town west of Columbus “have had their pets abducted and eaten by people who shouldn’t be in this country”. Before the debate, Trump also posted on his social media platform AI-generated images of himself with various animals, seemingly a reference to the Springfield claim.

Vance, who has long claimed that immigrants are draining resources in towns such as Springfield, was promoting the baseless suggestion in what appeared to be an effort to attack Harris. Police in Springfield told local news outlets that there are no reports of pets being stolen or eaten in the city.

Asked today about the unsubstantiated reports Vance had pushed, White House national security spokesman John Kirby called it “dangerous” misinformation.

Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are seen on a screen as they participate in a presidential debate in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Photo / AFP

“Because there will be people that believe it, no matter how ludicrous and stupid it is. And they might act on that kind of misinformation, and act on it in a way where somebody can get hurt, so it needs to stop,” Kirby said.

Vance’s sentiment yesterday attacking Harris and demonising immigrants in Springfield was quickly echoed by the Trump campaign and other Republicans in Congress, including Senator Ted Cruz (Texas). In a news release, the Trump campaign said residents of Springfield have “been left in terror as migrants overtake the once-quiet city” and that migrants were “dumped” “unvetted” in the city because of the Biden-Harris administration’s policies.

While Vance and the Trump campaign appeared to suggest that Haitian immigrants in Springfield arrived illegally and without proper vetting, the growing population of Haitian immigrants there live and work in the United States legally, according to an FAQ put together by the city of Springfield. Per the document, Haitian immigrants in Springfield arrived under the Immigration Parole Programme and were allowed to apply for temporary protected status, an authorisation that gives them the ability to work legally in the United States. To receive such status, immigrants must maintain a clean crime record.

In a statement yesterday to The Washington Post, a spokesperson for Vance said the senator received a “high volume of calls and emails over the past several weeks from concerned citizens in Springfield,” which prompted his tweet attacking Harris and citing the unverified reports about immigrants.

“Many residents have contacted Senator Vance to share their concerns over crime and traffic accidents, and to express that they no longer feel safe in their own homes,” the spokesperson said. “JD takes his constituents’ concerns seriously,” the spokesperson added.

The baseless notion that immigrants are hurting animals in Springfield appears to come from a viral Facebook post first shared in a Springfield Facebook group in which a user claimed that their neighbour’s daughter’s friend had found her lost cat hanging from a branch at a home where a Haitian neighbour lives.

The user then claimed, without evidence, that “Rangers & police” had told them that Haitian neighbours had also been hanging ducks and geese for butchering. Per the Springfield News-Sun, Springfield Police said yesterday that they are aware of the social media posts but that there was no evidence of such claims and that the issue is “not something that’s on our radar right now”.

But the police statement did not stop Republicans from amplifying Vance and the Trump campaign’s messaging against Harris and immigrants. The Trump campaign, in its news release, cited a Daily Mail story covering the Facebook user’s baseless claims. And in a post shared on X the Trump War Room said Trump, if elected, “will deport migrants who eat pets. Kamala Harris will send them to your town next. Make your choice, America”.

Cruz on X shared an image of two cats hugging each other with overlaid text reading: “Please vote for Trump so Haitian immigrants don’t eat us.” Representative Wesley Hunt (R-Texas) shared a video on X that contained AI-generated footage of Trump kissing a duck and knitting next to a cat.

“We cannot allow our pets to become a hot lunch for Kamala’s newcomers,” Hunt said in his post. “This November, you can do your part. Protect the Animals. Vote Trump.”