“We regret the US decision to reject the amendments,” WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in a statement posted on X.
He said the amendments “are clear about member states’ sovereignty”, adding that the WHO cannot mandate lockdowns or similar measures.
The changes included a stated “commitment to solidarity and equity” in which a new group would study the needs of developing countries in future emergencies.
Countries had until Saturday to lodge reservations about the amendments. Conservative activists and vaccine sceptics in Britain and Australia, which both have left-leaning governments, have waged public campaigns against the changes.
The amendments came about when the Assembly failed at a more ambitious goal of sealing a new global agreement on pandemics.
Most of the world finally secured a treaty this May, but the United States did not participate as it was in the process of withdrawing from the WHO.
The United States, then under President Joe Biden, took part in the May-June 2024 negotiations but said it could not support consensus as it demanded protections for US intellectual property rights on vaccine development.
Rubio’s predecessor Antony Blinken had welcomed the amendments as progress.
In their rejection of the amendments, Rubio and Kennedy said the changes “fail to adequately address the WHO’s susceptibility to the political influence and censorship – most notably from China – during outbreaks”.
WHO’s Ghebreyesus said the body is “impartial and works with all countries to improve people’s health”.
– Agence France-Presse