Antibody studies have indicated that immunity to the virus may wane over time, and this study seems to confirm this. However, while initial exposure to the virus may not give you absolute protection, it may mean "that subsequent infections may be milder than the first, as for this patient," the researchers said.
Will this change our approach to vaccines?
Dr David Strain, clinical senior lecturer at the University of Exeter, said the cases suggests that vaccinations may not provide the hope we have been waiting for. "Vaccinations work by simulating infection to the body, allowing it to develop antibodies. If antibodies don't provide lasting protection, we'll need to revert to a strategy of viral near-elimination in order to return to a more normal life." The experts behind the Oxford vaccine - seen as the front-runner in the race for a jab - have said people may need an annual booster, similar to the flu jab. The case also shows that people who have had coronavirus should also be included in any vaccination programmes.
Does this mean the virus has mutated into different strains?
Viruses mutate all the time, and the fact that the genetic sequences of the Hong Kong samples were different does not mean the virus has changed significantly. Dr Simon Clarke, associate professor in cellular microbiology at the University of Reading, said: "A mutant strain is nothing to be surprised by. It would be more interesting if there were no mutations cropping up."