Under the new regime what would have occurred with the Ainslie incident is Team NZ would have been awarded the race win and the Measurement Committee would have been called in to assess the damage.
Once they confirmed there was serious damage to the boat the Jury, consisting of members of the umpire team, would then consider redress.
The redress available would have been a postponement of any subsequent race that day and any scheduled races the following day, but the team would have needed to be ready to race again the day after.
Unlike usual match regattas there is no hearing involved - the Jury will act after getting confirmation of the serious damage from the Measurement Committee.
Redress will only be granted if there is clear fault on the part of the other team. In instances where the injured team may have contributed to the incident, or it is a 50-50 call, they will have to take the hit.
Likewise if a team has a breakdown or sustain damage through a capsize, there will no opportunity to postpone racing, meaning small mistakes will have the ability to cause serious headaches.
Team NZ boss Kevin Shoebridge told the Herald earlier this week reliability is a key challenge facing the teams.
"There's going to be no delays for start times or racing the next day if you've damage brought on by yourself as such or have a breakdown or malfunction - that's too bad, racing will go on. So the reliability is becoming a big, big issue," said Shoebridge.
"If you're racing two races a day, and you have a breakdown - you can see some big problems."