All of us get a warm feeling when talk ramps up about a side from the Pacific Islands but when the concept is distilled to the realities of such a project, the issues get more complex. The financial implications are heavy but that is an issue throughout the tournament.
Television ratings are not what they used to be and crowds have dropped as time differences, match standards and competing interests have bitten into the tournament.
An ill-advised expansion to 18 teams got the heave-ho and that will breed more caution into future regeneration or ideas about setting up a side from the Pacific Islands.
Shifting their base to Australia or New Zealand has been mooted but if that's the case why not shift the Jaguares and Sunwolves to simplify the punishing travel component?
Then there is the untapped market in the United States that has long fascinated those with a wider vision for the game. That connection found some more noise when Hawaiian investor Richard Fale suggested a side based there would offer that gateway to the US market and would also be a solid commercial partner for Sanzaar.
On many levels that concept would fit if there were enough players to sustain a decent side. It would also resurrect the notion that Super Rugby's awkward itinerary would be better served if teams from South Africa played in Europe and a schedule was revamped around the Pacific and western seaboard of the US.
They are all notions which will be thrown into the mix at the end of the Sanzaar deal.
Somewhere in the middle of that potpourri there should be room for a team from the Pacific.