Judge O'Driscoll said the Crown was in favour of discontinuing name suppression.
There was "no doubt" publication would impact on other people known by McLenaghan but publication could act as a deterrent to offending.
"I don't think the publication of your name is likely to affect the victim. He has a different name and a significant amount of time has now passed."
Referring to a letter before him advocating for continued suppression, Judge O'Driscoll said "this is a small community" and it was likely people already knew about the details of the case.
"I would infer that many people in the community already know what has occurred and that you have been found guilty particularly as you have not been in the community for some time," Judge O'Driscoll said.
Name publication was part of the penalty for those who committed crime, the judge said.
- Greymouth Star