Gareth Morgan, who could spring a surprise at this year's election, has never been afraid to offer up ideas that will meet widespread scorn initially, but improve with time. So it may for his suggested regulation of domestic cats. The idea has found support from enough city and district councils
Weekend Herald editorial: Bush and parks could hear birdsong again
Subscribe to listen
The Opportunities Party leader Gareth Morgan. Photo / Dean Purcell
Cats and dogs make quite different pets. Dogs are more needy, obedient, easily trained and confined and if need be can be tethered. Cats are more independent. They can be responsive companions when they feel like itbut they are just as content with their own company. And they are normally indifferent to commands. Yet while responsible dog owners readily accept registration and other social obligations, cat lovers hiss at the very suggestion.
They are not called cat owners usually, to have a cat is not to feel like you "own" it. The animal has chosen to make your home its own as long as you feed it. It reserves the right to range. It is possibly this admirable independence that accounts for their human admirers' fierce objections to registering and controlling their movements. The libertarian Taxpayers Union was the first group to condemn the Local Government NZ resolution this week.
But there is no denying cats are contributing to the diminished birdlife these days in the bush and urban parks of New Zealand. To take a trip to one of the cat-free islands where the Department of Conservation has eradicated rats and stoats is to realise that without those beautiful, throaty calls of our native birds, our magnificent natural rainforest is missing something vital.
It is sad that almost the only place most Kiwis hear this country's native birdsong is when they walk past a recording of it, in a museum or Auckland Airport's international arrival hall. It should be everywhere, and with a concerted effort it could be. Cat lovers should listen.