And, to be clear, we should reduce Asian immigration.
What's not clear is who Peters would have the men fighting. Would he have them fighting for the Government? Or against the Government? Or should they join one of the estimated 1000 rebel groups?
His is a peculiarly Peters-type solution - and just what Syria needs: more Syrians fighting each other. And it's pure Peters that he doesn't flesh out exactly who they should be fighting. I would have thought that a critical policy detail.
Angelina Jolie has confused me. As UN special envoy on refugees she can normally be relied upon. But she said the world must distinguish economic migrants fleeing poverty and refugees fleeing for their lives.
She may have been having a dig at Geldof. I am not sure. The people he has staying over may only be poor and not real refugees. Certainly he has more history with feeding the poor. Jolie has focused on refugees.
But Jolie says just taking refugees won't solve the problem. She's urging diplomatic efforts to end the conflict in Syria. That would be nice. Instead of taking in more Syrians we should perhaps be sending Murray McCully. Or Peters.
Jolie makes it sound hard. It sounds easy when Geldof says what we should do. He has that ability. It's like when he organised a concert to feed Africa. World problems appeared easier in the 1980s.
Meanwhile, the British Government launched a drone attack into Syria that killed two British jihadists. The drone was piloted from 5000km away in England and the jihadists were hit driving their vehicle.
It's amazingly complex. The human suffering is real and witnessed. The answer must lie somewhere between Geldof opening up his homes, Peters urging Syrians to fight on, Jolie calling for diplomacy and drones attacking Jihadists. Surely.