At last count it was home to more than 54 nationalities.
Although many of that number are from Asian nations, a survey by the Asia New Zealand Foundation had discovered that two-thirds of people — presumably not Asian people — say they knew little or nothing about Asia.
Yet this country has had a significant Asian population since the mid-19th century. For 100 years, starting in the 1860s, Asians, however defined, were New Zealand's third largest ethnic group.
As historian Tony Ballantyne showed in his brilliant book Webs of Empire: "New Zealand is and has always been a society that contains a complex and hybridised mix of racial, ethnic, linguistic and religious communities."
That Asians are now seen as exotic and mysterious by so many is the result of a quirk of our history that had decided that this is a nation of two halves — Pakeha and Maori — and some time ago wrote Asians out of the national story, relegating them to mere footnotes.
The reason some people find, for instance, Chinese-language restaurant signs unsettling is that they threaten our cosy bicultural view of ourselves. Asians, according to this mindset, should confine themselves to Lantern Festival and Diwali and keep their heads down the rest of the year.
New Zealand is not a bicultural society — one in four Aucklanders is Asian, according to some estimates. It is a multicultural society with a special position afforded to the tangata whenua. Only by recognising that context can each culture properly respect the tower. It's a little easier in Mt Roskill — people just have to look next door.
It was reported this week that South African athlete Oscar Pistorius is facing his "biggest challenge yet" in a Cape Town courtroom. Perhaps given the uncontested circumstances — that he shot dead his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp — reports on the trial should avoid using the language of heroic narratives, as though this were another sporting contest.
Busily not making political capital out of the royal visit this week, several politicians pointed out that they were not making political capital out of the royal visit and criticised the Prime Minister for making political capital out of the royal visit by hosting it in an election year. A pity they didn't realise that 2014 was an election year when the royal visit was announced. Then they could have got their cavilling over without looking as though they were making political capital out of the royal visit.