"The district council made the conscious decision to hold back the report until the night of the meeting, which gave people no time at all to read and digest the findings of it.
"If people had had time to read the report, which was just recently done, they may have voted otherwise, instead of listening to the fear-mongering that was offered up on Monday night."
In the report, the trees were determined by arborist Nick Ellis as a "tolerable risk", with recommendations made to remove the deadwood throughout the trees.
"The trees currently serve a purpose as a wind-break to the domain, as well as offering some ecological value to the area, playing host to a range of epiphytes," Mr Ellis said.
He said the roots of the trees were "no doubt" providing a valuable barrier to further erosion of the bank near the sole entranceway to the Domain, but were also nearing the end of their "useful life expectancy".
Findings in the report confirmed the trees could be retained for another 10-20 years with ongoing maintenance.
Masterton District Council spokesman Sam Rossiter-Stead said it would cost $12,830 to fell the trees. He said it would cost a few thousand dollars for new planting.
Mr Stuart, who has lived in the Mauriceville area for 40 years said he can't see the point in cutting out "perfectly functional" trees.
"Once the trees are taken out, the roots will rot and there's a risk that the bank will collapse, which was discussed at the meeting and the council was bound by the meeting to re-site the road into the domain if it did collapse -- another cost to the ratepayers when that happens."
The fate of the trees will be confirmed at the next MDC meeting, but Mr Stuart said he can't see the decision being anything other than removal "because they've already let the contract for that".
"On the bright side, it was suggested that a management committee be formed of people in the district to manage the grounds in the future," Mr Stuart said.