The announcement that Auckland Cricket will continue to play all its domestic cricket matches on Eden Park No 2 should spell the end of Auckland Council's unpopular stadium strategy. The unfortunate reality is that it will do nothing of the sort. The strategy will continue despite little public support and
John Watson: Stadium policy should be knocked for six
Subscribe to listen
Eden Park No 2 will continue to be the home of domestic cricket in Auckland. Photo / Greg Bowker
To date, the true financial cost of all this rejigging of Auckland's stadiums has proven to be elusive. Regional Facilities Auckland (RFA) has issued wildly contradictory financial assessments of the proposed cost. Its chief executive initially stated it would take $100 million to get Mt Smart up to scratch. That was before it was revealed this princely sum included multi-storey carparks, new grandstands and lavish concourses - all of which were unnecessary and none of which were required by the NRL.
From this extreme, RFA then glided seamlessly to quoting a much reduced sum of $12 million to develop the Western Springs boutique stadium - this when Hagley Oval in Christchurch, a similar project, cost more than $20 million. The tactic seems to be to get the "strategy" advanced to a point from which it will be difficult to turn back. Ratepayers can then be hit up for additional money to complete the job in the future.
No less fluid has been the strategy itself following the Eden Park Trust Board's rejection of the "integrated management" proposal which was to be the centrepiece of the original strategy. For its part, the Auckland Council has shown little interest in challenging its council-controlled organisation over the unpopular and expensive proposal. There has been no oversight by councillors and no attempt to involve the public. Instead there has been an unquestioning deference to the demands of RFA at a time when the rest of the community is being subject to major cuts in spending and services.
A recent series of forums by the Parks, Recreation and Sport Committee, for example, revealed a disturbing number of clubs struggling to cope with inferior grounds and facilities, especially in the south and west where playing numbers have risen exponentially. In some of Auckland's poorest suburbs clubs have had to turn away youngsters because of inadequate facilities.
In these circumstances surely a more affordable and pragmatic "strategy" is called for. Speedway should remain at Western Springs (with concerts and club rugby); Eden Park No 2, which hosts first-class cricket, can be further developed into a test venue as it already has many of the required facilities and is a complementary fit with the No 1 ground; a modest maintenance budget is advanced for Mt Smart and the Warriors, and North Harbour Stadium is utilised more for a range of codes and events.
Maybe then a portion of the saved millions can be diverted into helping the grassroots clubs who actually keep the stadiums going - as ratepayers, as spectators and as the people who develop the sportsmen and women who eventually grace these arenas as players.
John Watson is Auckland councillor for the Albany ward.