Hager told the jury today he would have felt "uncomfortable" about publishing sexual allegations from an ex-spouse unless he had done a lot of work and collaboration.
Hager told the court he had been called to give evidence due to his experience as an investigative journalist.
Hager, who has published five books unveiling cover-ups in New Zealand politics and the military, said while his area of expertise was not in sexual violence cases, standard principles governed the publication process of all books that made allegations.
"If I'm not absolutely sure of something, I don't publish it."
Publications involving individuals who had previously been involved in a relationship or marriage required extra care, he said.
"I would of course [have] confronted the person about whom these allegations are being made," Hager told the court.
When asked by Mr Wishart, who is representing himself, whether he would have published The Hunt based on the research which had been presented to him by Mr London, Hager replied he would have reached a different decision to his colleague.
Mr Hager also told the jury that in some scenarios, a "single source" may be enough for a journalist, however that source would have to be highly credible and present solid evidence.
Mr Wishart is expected to give evidence when the trial resumes tomorrow.