Interim name suppression orders prevented the media from identifying Jago for more than two years until he abandoned his fight for ongoing secrecy in February.
Jago maintains his innocence and has signalled he plans to appeal his convictions and sentence in the Court of Appeal.
Today, Jago’s lawyer Ian Brookie confirmed the appeal had been set down for June 17 in Auckland.
The grounds for the appeal are that “a miscarriage of justice” occurred because the jury reached an unreasonable verdict and the judge’s summing up was unbalanced and incomplete relating to delay, the defence case and propensity.
Jago will also argue the jail sentence imposed was manifestly excessive, with home detention the appropriate sentence.
Survivor Paul Oliver has previously spoken about the relief he felt when Jago was finally named and how the pending appeal makes it harder to move on with his life.
Responding to today’s update, he and his wife Lauren Oliver said the case continued to have a huge impact on those who were abused.
“It seems like a lot of time wasting and expense for Jago’s own vanity project.
“Mr Jago wasn’t eligible for home detention because he was still insisting his innocence. That’s why the prison sentence. He wasn’t afforded sentence reductions.”
They said the true miscarriage of justice was Jago still affording a high-profile lawyer when his victims got “paltry sums” at sentencing.
Miscarriages of justice are most associated with innocent people being convicted and punished for a crime, as recently seen in the Peter Ellis case.
More generally, Ministry of Justice statistics released in 2023 showed 893 people have had a total of 2303 convictions quashed, or quashed and remitted, since 2012.
