"The peril of not taking that into consideration is now obvious, if it wasn't before."
Describing a carbon credit as a "construct of international agreements and New Zealand's Emissions Trading Scheme", Mr Wilton contends the credits alone have "no intrinsic value".
Mr Wilton said his company had the "clear view from the time the ETS first included post 1990 forests, that extraordinary caution should be urged".
"We have held from the outset that if somebody wants to engage in carbon forestry, that somebody does so at considerable peril."
Mr Wilton describes the plummeting prices as "a precursor to what was going to happen anyway".
"Kyoto was meant to solve the world's carbon problem, and then carbon has no value, and all you have got is the trees in the ground. It [carbon alone] is a short-sighted investment."
With carbon credit prices falling, there is also a decreasing penalty for forest owners who might choose to harvest and not replant.
Under legislation, these owners are deemed to have lost the carbon credits and must purchase them from somewhere else.
This is now a cheaper option than it was, and commentators have noted that works against the Government's aims of encouraging forest planting and discouraging deforestation.