Wednesday, 06 December 2023
KaitaiaWhangareiDargavilleAucklandThamesTaurangaHamiltonWhakataneRotoruaTokoroaTe KuitiTaumarunuiTaupoGisborneNew PlymouthNapierHastingsDannevirkeWhanganuiPalmerston NorthLevinParaparaumuMastertonWellingtonMotuekaNelsonBlenheimWestportReeftonKaikouraGreymouthHokitikaChristchurchAshburtonTimaruWanakaOamaruQueenstownDunedinGoreInvercargill
NZ HeraldThe Northern AdvocateThe Northland AgeThe AucklanderWaikato HeraldBay Of Plenty TimesRotorua Daily PostHawke's Bay TodayWhanganui ChronicleThe Stratford PressManawatu GuardianKapiti NewsHorowhenua ChronicleTe Awamutu CourierVivaEat WellOneRoofDRIVEN Car GuideThe CountryPhoto SalesiHeart RadioRestaurant Hub
Voyager 2023 media awards
Subscribe

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.
Home / New Zealand

Earthquake prediction a risky business

Jamie Morton
By
Jamie Morton
21 Feb, 2013 04:30 PM3 mins to read
Saveshare

Share this article

facebookcopy linktwitterlinkedinredditemail
The South Brighton bridge after Christchurch's 6.3 magnitude earthquake. Photo / Sarah Ivey

The South Brighton bridge after Christchurch's 6.3 magnitude earthquake. Photo / Sarah Ivey

"What most people want is not knowledge, but certainty."

It's an apt quote of philosopher Bertrand Russell that Italy's Professor Massimiano Bucchi borrows to sum up people's expectation of what science should be able to tell us before earthquakes happen.

And this demand has only grown as science has advanced over recent decades, said Professor Bucchi, a professor of Science in Society at the University of Trento and a keynote speaker at this week's Science Communicators Association of New Zealand conference in Christchurch.

"If you look at recent policy documents and discussions, the only argument given for supporting and strengthening research is its practical use - technology, innovation, development," he told the Herald.

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

"In the long run, this dangerously raises expectations towards science and poses huge problems when they cannot be fulfilled."

Also, he said, scientific expertise no longer appeared any more in public as a unanimous, consensual voice.

Sir Peter Gluckman, the Prime Minister's chief science adviser, saw this happen in the aftermath of the Christchurch earthquake.

"In the early days, GNS had lots of different spokesmen after every quake - but once the community had a consistent spokesman, the story was more coherent, and I think that helped a lot."

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

Sir Peter was also concerned to see technical debates playing out on the front pages of newspapers.

He was preparing a report to be delivered to the Government this year, addressing issues around risk and miscommunication.

An extreme example of the gravity and danger that came with publicly forecasting the probability of earthquakes was seen in Italy last year, when six scientists and officials were convicted for downplaying the likelihood of a major shake six days before the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake struck and killed about 300 people.

Reacting to their convictions, GNS Science released a statement arguing the case had been about science communication, and not quake prediction.

Related articles

New Zealand|Education

Parata denies promises

20 Feb 06:10 AM
New Zealand

Quake memorial comes at 'crucial turning point'

21 Feb 05:10 AM
New Zealand

Expert: Capitalise on Chch quake

21 Feb 01:58 AM
New Zealand

Port Hills zoning decision delayed again

21 Feb 01:40 AM

"The main lesson from the Italian case is that a great deal of care must be taken by scientists in communicating what they know and don't know about the likelihood of future earthquake occurrences, both to public authorities and to the public," GNS principal scientist Dr David Rhoades told the Herald.

The expert committee were aware the risk in l'Aquila was much above normal because of the swarm that was going on at the time, but they also knew that, based on similar occurrences in past, the probability of an imminent disastrous earthquake was low.

But Dr Rhodes said the message given by one member of the committee emphasised only the second point and not the first, probably because they were trying to reassure the public and counter the predictions of controversial researcher Giampaolo Giuliani.

Victoria University's Dr Tim Stern said such forecasting was especially tricky in Western democracies.

"You can damage property values and create distrust by crying wolf too often."

Saveshare

Share this article

facebookcopy linktwitterlinkedinredditemail

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

Latest from New Zealand

New Zealand

How to avoid stolen packages this Christmas

05 Dec 11:14 PM
New Zealand

Unusual shark washes up on Dunedin beach, far from home

05 Dec 10:48 PM
New Zealand

Students protest against 'sexist' uniform policy

New Zealand

'Appetite not there': What next for $37m spa plans?

05 Dec 10:23 PM

Toy trends for Christmas

sponsored

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

Latest from New Zealand

How to avoid stolen packages this Christmas

How to avoid stolen packages this Christmas

05 Dec 11:14 PM

Police are urging the community to be vigilant this summer.

Unusual shark washes up on Dunedin beach, far from home

Unusual shark washes up on Dunedin beach, far from home

05 Dec 10:48 PM
Students protest against 'sexist' uniform policy

Students protest against 'sexist' uniform policy

'Appetite not there': What next for $37m spa plans?

'Appetite not there': What next for $37m spa plans?

05 Dec 10:23 PM
More houses coming
sponsored

More houses coming

About NZMEHelp & SupportContact UsSubscribe to NZ HeraldHouse Rules
Manage Your Print SubscriptionNZ Herald E-EditionAdvertise with NZMEBook Your AdPrivacy Policy
Terms of UseCompetition Terms & ConditionsSubscriptions Terms & Conditions
© Copyright 2023 NZME Publishing Limited
TOP