You can read, for instance, that cardiothoracic surgeon Edward Ernest John Smith's risk-adjusted patient mortality rate of 3.93 per cent was "okay" and "within the expected range".
The Herald asked for the data just before the OIA's 22-day summer holiday. The Auckland, Waikato, Capital and Coast, Canterbury and Southern DHBs in February gave themselves an extension before making a decision - against which the newspaper has appealed to the Ombudsman - in mid to late March. Days later the Medical Council publicly called for debate on the release of data on doctors.
The DHBs' spokesman, Canterbury's chief medical officer, Dr Nigel Millar, said in his letter, which reflects the other four: "The information you have requested represents, with current systems, a complex data extraction followed by an analysis that is not possible. In particular, the system from the NHS requires adjustments to the raw mortality figures based on other clinical information not currently readily available here."
The five boards supplied some DHB-level data on death rates from several kinds of heart surgery and neurosurgery, which can be found on the nzherald.co.nz Data Blog. It is raw data from which no reliable comparisons can be made.