The self-appointed Pied Piper of the North, New Zealand First leader Winston Peters, has the words "Follow Me" on the back of his campaign bus. It is a reference to his Twitter account. What is notable is the colour of that bus: blue. The backdrop is a photo of the
Claire Trevett: Rival old dogs' paws crossed for win-win in North

Subscribe to listen
New Zealand First leader Winston Peters, has the words 'Follow Me' on the back of his campaign bus. Photo / NZME.

Perhaps the most perverse aspect of all is that the MP who stands to benefit most from a Peters win is Wellington-based United Future leader Peter Dunne. Dunne was quick to work out it would mean National would need him or the Maori Party to pass legislation, rather than just Act's David Seymour. Voters hated it when the tail (one Winston Peters) was seen to be wagging the dog (National) in the 1990s. The smaller the tail, the greater the outrage, and it doesn't get much smaller than Dunne. Yet the minute Peters announced his intentions, Dunne started wagging in delight. He tweeted that if Peters won, "balance of power delivered to UF and/or Maori Party - brilliant strategy". Dunne even started musing about revisiting the confidence and supply agreement he has with National to reflect the greater power he would have. He also identified the first issue he would flex his newfound muscle on - National's Resource Management Act reforms, which he opposes, and which National is campaigning on in Northland.
Dunne and Peters have a long-standing and bitter rivalry. It is the first time Dunne has wanted Peters to win anything. The reason is self-interest. At first glance, it seemed Prime Minister John Key didn't appreciate Dunne's sudden development of the political equivalent of the seven-year itch. But it quickly became clear Key had worked out that Dunne's cockahoop claims to hold the balance of power were one of National's best weapons for neutralising Peters. He observed if Peters was to win Northland it would deliver "a stronger Peter Dunne" and questioned if voters wanted that. United Future's dire election result had answered that question in advance: voters didn't want that. But one person did: Peter Dunne. His reply to Key's question was on Twitter: "If it happens, ah, actually yes I do."
The unveiling of the MPs' election expenses was revealing about just how small a tail Dunne really was. While he spent about $17,000 on his Ohariu campaign, United Future spent a paltry $1995 on its party vote campaign last year. Even United Future has stopped pretending it is anything but a shell party.
The reason for keeping it on life support is that Dunne gets more resources and speaking slots in Parliament as the leader of a registered party than as an independent MP. The same could be said of Act's Seymour, but at least Act put in some effort. Nor has it bothered to try to throw its featherlight weight around.
Key's other technique to shore up National voters has been to point to Peters' longevity. Peters will turn 70 a fortnight after the byelection. Key has indelicately pointed out Northland voters will figure out they might get Peters for a good time, but not a long time. Even Peters will one day shuffle off this political coil and wander off with SuperGold Card in hand. In that respect, depicting Cape Reinga - where the spirits of the dead leave - on the side of Peters' bus was possibly not the type of message Peters was after.