Today, the Court of Appeal released its judgment which throws out the pair's appeals against their convictions, concluding that allegations of juror bias were unfounded.
However, Rolleston had his prison term reduced by 15 months, with a new sentence of nine years and 11 months' imprisonment, while Roche had his sentence of 10 years and nine months' imprisonment quashed and substituted with a sentence of nine years and seven months' imprisonment.
The appeal judges found that the pair's age should have attracted a greater reduction by Judge Garland who "placed considerable weight on the failure of either young man to take responsibility for their offending".
"We accept that feature, together with their regrettable attitude and lack of understanding of the impact of their offending on the victim, is indicative of a lack of contrition or remorse. However, it is equally indicative of their immaturity," the Court of Appeal concluded.