The Reserve Bank duly lifted the OCR to 3 per cent from 2.5 per cent in mid-2010. The hike felt like a big kick in the guts of the economy and by the end of the year the Reserve Bank was already revising down its inflation outlook.
Europe's near-meltdowns in 2009 and 2010 dragged further on the inflation outlook. The February 2011 earthquake in Canterbury was the excuse used, but the Reserve Bank's decision in March 2011 to cut the OCR to 2.5 per cent was almost inevitable, given the economy's failure to kick on and recover as expected.
Those who fixed mortgages in 2009 then had to endure either painful years of paying 2 or 3 per cent more than variable rates or paying big break fees. Fast-forward four years and economists and the Reserve Bank are warning again of sharply higher rates. This time, they say, is different because the economy is growing so strongly and inflation will inevitably increase unless the bank tightens.
"It's different this time" is one of the most dangerous phrases in the worlds of finance and markets.
It should make anyone look at an accepted view with an extra big grain of salt. Those who fixed mortgages in 2009 will be particularly sceptical. Inflation is actually still very subdued. Some think a Chinese financial meltdown or another European crisis could derail the global recovery, and there remain plenty of doubts about how New Zealand's heavily indebted households will cope with higher interest rates. Longer-term fixed rates have already risen sharply to the point where there aren't that many benefits to fixing on higher rates now. Remember, fixing a mortgage is essentially second-guessing that interest rates will rise faster than currently expected.
Those who fixed on low rates last year are in a better position but deciding to fix now is not the obvious winner that many portray. It carries risks, too. Just ask the fixers of 2009.