Monday, 11 December 2023
KaitaiaWhangareiDargavilleAucklandThamesTaurangaHamiltonWhakataneRotoruaTokoroaTe KuitiTaumarunuiTaupoGisborneNew PlymouthNapierHastingsDannevirkeWhanganuiPalmerston NorthLevinParaparaumuMastertonWellingtonMotuekaNelsonBlenheimWestportReeftonKaikouraGreymouthHokitikaChristchurchAshburtonTimaruWanakaOamaruQueenstownDunedinGoreInvercargill
NZ HeraldThe Northern AdvocateThe Northland AgeThe AucklanderWaikato HeraldBay Of Plenty TimesRotorua Daily PostHawke's Bay TodayWhanganui ChronicleThe Stratford PressManawatu GuardianKapiti NewsHorowhenua ChronicleTe Awamutu CourierVivaEat WellOneRoofDRIVEN Car GuideThe CountryPhoto SalesiHeart RadioRestaurant Hub
Voyager 2023 media awards
Subscribe
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Home / New Zealand / Politics

Assisted dying bill returns to Parliament with uncertain future

By
Boris Jancic
30 Jul, 2019 05:00 PM4 mins to read
Saveshare

Share this article

facebookcopy linktwitterlinkedinredditemail
Politicians are set to spend months debating the details of the End of Life Choice Bill from today. Photo / Mark Mitchell

Politicians are set to spend months debating the details of the End of Life Choice Bill from today. Photo / Mark Mitchell

A long battle is set to break out in Parliament as politicians begin to hammer out the details of a controversial bill legalising euthanasia.

David Seymour's End of Life Choice Bill passed by 70 votes to 50 at its second reading last month, but could be left hanging by a thread as a complex and drawn-out Committee of the Whole House begins on Wednesday.

This stage will see politicians debating and individually voting on possibly more than a hundred changes to the bill, in a process that may stretch - optimistically - four months.

The legislation originally allowed the terminally ill or those with "grievous and irremediable" conditions to legally request assisted dying, with clearance from two doctors.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Facing concerns the "irremediable" clause could have wide-reaching implications for groups such as the disabled community, Seymour this week put forward an amendment, among a series of others, to limit access to just those with six months to live.

But it's another proposed amendment that could put a spanner in the works.

NZ First's members are demanding a public referendum be added to the legislation and last week put forward a supplementary order paper to that effect.

They will vote "no" on Seymour's bill if the referendum isn't accepted by the House.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Act Leader David Seymour has limited his bill to just those that are dying in hopes of securing backing. Photo / Paul Taylor
Act Leader David Seymour has limited his bill to just those that are dying in hopes of securing backing. Photo / Paul Taylor

"If we don't get the plebiscite option, then we don't believe 120 MPs temporarily ensconced here have the right to change the law for euthanasia purposes," NZ First's Shane Jones said.

Without the party's nine votes, Seymour cannot afford to lose even a single net aye from the second reading.

He has promised to support the referendum, and has been raising it with prospective "yes" voters while lobbying and negotiating in recent weeks.

He faces a sea of maybes on the issue.

Related articles

New Zealand|Politics

Scores of proposed amendments could push euthanasia bill into next year

23 Jun 02:32 AM
New Zealand|Politics

How your MP voted on euthanasia

26 Jun 10:49 AM
New Zealand

Parliament blessed after euthanasia debate

27 Jun 05:56 AM
New Zealand|Politics

Audrey Young: Why the euthanasia bill is not all it seemed

28 Jun 05:00 PM

The referendum amendment will be among the last to be debated, meaning plenty of MPs are taking a wait-and-see approach.

"It's fair to say that other people around Parliament have some reservations and are weighing up whether they'll support it to see the bill go through," Seymour said.

Some firm supporters of the bill overall, such as Labour's Louisa Wall, are totally opposed to a referendum on the grounds the following debate could cause more harm to the vulnerable and would be an abdication of responsibility.

NZ First's Shane Jones says it's either a referendum or a "no" vote from his party. Photo / John Stone
NZ First's Shane Jones says it's either a referendum or a "no" vote from his party. Photo / John Stone

Others, such as Justice Minister Andrew Little, say they'll vote for it if it's necessary to make the law happen. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says she doesn't like the idea of a referendum, but has stopped short of ruling it out completely.

If a plebiscite does happen, it may have good odds of passing.

A 1 News Colmar Brunton Poll this week found 72 per cent of those surveyed believed "a person who is terminally or incurably ill should be able to request the assistance of a doctor to end their life".

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Aside from the referendum, a number of MPs, such as Labour's Willie Jackson, gave their backing at the second reading on the grounds the bill would be tightened up and include extra safeguards.

The Select Committee that looked at the bill failed to come up with substantial fixes and Seymour now hopes the list of amendments he's put out this week will do the trick and swing a new few votes his way.

Other changes include requiring the patient to always initiate the discussion about assisted dying.

Wall and National's Lawrence Yule are also putting forward their own amendment to let the Family Court make the final decision.

Meanwhile, Chris Penk will be part of a group of National MPs who are opposed and have promised to introduce more than 100 amendments during the committee process, potentially dragging it into next year.

They deny it's stonewalling, and say they want to fix and point out flaws.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

National's Judith Collins - who swapped to a "yes" at the second reading - on Tuesday said she hoped no one would be playing "silly buggers" with the process.

She wouldn't specify who she meant.

Seymour takes solace in a parliamentary rule that means amendments cannot contradict each other, and says he has a strategic advantage by having his proposed changes heard first.

The amendments will be debated on Members' Days at Parliament, which only take place once every second week, and each of its four parts has to be considered in a separate session.

Once all parts have been voted on, the bill will go to a third and final reading.

Saveshare

Share this article

facebookcopy linktwitterlinkedinredditemail
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Latest from New Zealand

New Zealand

Iwi boss installs boulders to block vehicle access to beach

11 Dec 01:45 AM
New Zealand

Unique blend of pharmacy and hobby shop proves popular

11 Dec 01:44 AM
Talanoa

'I forgive the culprit who stole my car. We all deserve second chances'

11 Dec 01:40 AM
BusinessUpdated

Watch: The highs and lows of owning a small business in NZ

11 Dec 01:39 AM

“Never been a better time to buy an EV”

sponsored
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Latest from New Zealand

Iwi boss installs boulders to block vehicle access to beach

Iwi boss installs boulders to block vehicle access to beach

11 Dec 01:45 AM

Bayden Barber says children are being 'run off the beach by vehicles'.

Unique blend of pharmacy and hobby shop proves popular

Unique blend of pharmacy and hobby shop proves popular

11 Dec 01:44 AM
'I forgive the culprit who stole my car. We all deserve second chances'

'I forgive the culprit who stole my car. We all deserve second chances'

11 Dec 01:40 AM
Watch: The highs and lows of owning a small business in NZ

Watch: The highs and lows of owning a small business in NZ

11 Dec 01:39 AM
9 big questions over an EV road trip
sponsored

9 big questions over an EV road trip

About NZMEHelp & SupportContact UsSubscribe to NZ HeraldHouse Rules
Manage Your Print SubscriptionNZ Herald E-EditionAdvertise with NZMEBook Your AdPrivacy Policy
Terms of UseCompetition Terms & ConditionsSubscriptions Terms & Conditions
© Copyright 2023 NZME Publishing Limited
TOP