Without those opposing voices, this proposal can fairly be said to have majority support, based on the evidence in front of us, and good decisions rely on good evidence. By not contributing a view, those opposed strengthened the supporting case.
The idea the council doesn’t listen to the community assumes the community is of one united view, which it isn’t. Our community is not homogenous. There are thousands of groups and individuals who all have their own opinions, values and priorities. As representatives, we must acquaint ourselves with this range of perspectives to ensure they are captured in the decision-making process.
On the council sit a vet, a nurse, a teacher, a scientist, a public servant, an analyst (that’s me), a former police commander, students, business owners, and community sector workers. This diversity takes us all into different communities, with different views to engage with and represent. What I enjoy most about this role is advocating for residents and getting to know them. Forming real connections with people leads to a greater understanding of each other and the role the public voice plays in council.
Submissions are a critical factor in how elected representatives can gather and hold all the multitudes of conflicting public views, and reconcile them in the context of the evidence and data each decision puts before us. This is the flip side of representation: governance. We each consider all the evidence. We each get a chance to speak; we each get a vote. And as per democracy, the majority wins.
Kaydee Zabelin is a Palmerston North city councillor.