Crucially, it's still more socially acceptable for men to be outwardly competitive.
Women's historic positioning as the sweet, passive, 'weaker sex' has lead them to shy away from this kind of display, so our feelings of competition tend to manifest differently. This, or women actually have a mean gene, and I don't think scientists haven't found that one yet.
Referring to any behaviour as animal in nature reduces it, trivialises it, and belittles it.
What term do we use for male social aggression? Exactly. So the first step is to eradicate the moronic calls of "Meaow" or "Claws out, ladies!".
Not to say women's sentiments are always laudable, obviously, but they are always human. And that's the crux: syntactical denigration - or reducing women to anything less than human, through language - is a common symptom of sexist beliefs. So it has to go.
Presumably, seeing as men have more testosterone than women, they are also more competitive and aggressive than women. Actually, not presumably at all, because this has also been proven by science. So maybe money and time is better spent researching how men can control their aggression - which in its worst manifestation fuels violence against other men and women - rather than on studies that perpetuate gender stereotypes by their very nature. That'd be the cat's meow. (Sorry.)
Follow Life & Style Online on Twitter. Follow Rebecca Kamm on Twitter.