It's important because we can't change what we don't measure. We know we have some serious challenges when it comes to non-communicable diseases, and we know that many of them relate to diet. But experts can't make recommendations, let alone policies and strategies, if they don't really know what we're eating. In the past, the survey data analysis uncovered some issues; for example we weren't getting enough iodine or folate. We've since made headway on solving this through fortification of some foods.
When we think about the past 10 years, so much has changed. Our food supply, for example; we're eating foods that were unheard of 10 years ago. And in our society and culture; 10 years ago smartphones were new and UberEats wasn't even imagined. What impact has that had? We don't really know.
Our health researchers need up-to-date data to work with. Right now, they can delve into the data and come up with interesting reports, but how relevant are they when that data is so old?
The food industry wants a survey too; this may be one of the few issues on which industry and public health professionals are united.
Professor Jim Mann of Otago University, one of the symposium's organisers, says there's a desperate need for a new survey.
"We are saying nutrition is incredibly important for human health, but currently we don't actually know what New Zealanders are eating," he says.
He points to recent research from Otago University highlighting the importance of fibre: "If we are saying there is a lot of evidence for the benefits of dietary fibre – and the whole world is talking about it – how much fibre are we having in New Zealand? We haven't got a clue."
* Niki Bezzant is editor-at-large for Healthy Food Guide www.healthyfood.co.nz