The results shed fresh light on the old argument about whether nature - what you are born with - is more or less important than nurture, or what you learn in life. The scientists said the findings suggest that nature and nurture are not alternatives, but interact closely.
The study looked at the way 11-month-old babies responded to seeing a ball apparently rolling through a solid wall. In another experiment, a toy car could be seen rolling off a ledge into mid-air without falling.
On both occasions, the gaze of the babies became significantly longer compared to parallel tests where the ball and toy car did what the babies expected and were stopped by the wall or fell to the floor respectively.
The study also found that when surprised in this way, the babies were more likely to become interested in the objects. They would bang the ball, for instance, against a surface as if to test its solidity, while they would drop the car to see if it fell to the floor.
Although the research involved 11-month-old babies, the scientists believe that the same findings would hold for even younger infants who have not yet had the chance to learn about solid walls or the effect of gravity on a toy car, the scientists said.
"The reason that we picked 11-month-old infants is because we needed babies who are old enough to have fine motor skills to be able to handle these objects in particular ways," said Aimee Stahl, co-author of the study published in the journal Science.
"The infant's behaviours are not merely reflexive responses to the novelty of surprising outcomes, but instead reflect deeper attempts to learn about aspects of the world that failed to accord with expectations," Ms Stahl said. "Our results highlight how nature and nurture profitably interact with one another."
- Independent