"The Crown took appropriate steps to ensure, to the extent it could, that the airport company was complying, or had complied, with its s40 obligations," it said in relation to the Avion Tce sale.
But a few years ago the Crown had reconsidered its position on the interpretation of the Public Works Act and considered the chief executive of Land Information New Zealand was responsible for complying with the offer-back provisions of the act and "making any decisions under those in relation to any land held for a public work by an airport company".
And the Crown also concluded there had been a Treaty breach in regards to the Avion Tce sale.
"After selling its interests in the airport company, the Crown took the view that responsibility for considering offer back sat with the company and the Crown failed to take appropriate action to ensure the protective mechanisms in section 40 of the Public Works Act, which protect the former owner's interests, were fulfilled.
"The acts and omissions of the Crown regarding the application of the offer back provisions in the Public Works Act to the land in Avion Tce cumulatively mean that the interests of the former Ngāti Puketapu owners were not properly considered or protected when the airport company sold the land in 1999 on the basis that it was surplus to requirements.
"This was a breach of te Tiriti o Waitangi / The Treaty of Waitangi and its principles."