The economic package announced for this extreme disruption to our economy will be too cumbersome and too late in effect.
Cuts in interest rates and huge government packages targeted at wage subsidies and beneficiaries and healthcare are unlikely to alleviate the calamity unfolding each day.
• Coronavirus: NZ facing worst-case economic scenario, says Grant Robertson
• Coronavirus financial package: A massive, economy-wide wage subsidy shows how serious the situation is
• Coronavirus: Economy 'in the eye of the storm' – Finance Minister Grant Robertson says
• Coronavirus financial package: Government's $12b support plan for businesses, beneficiaries
This economic crisis is unfolding in real time. It requires a real time response. Our economy is in free fall. We are about to experience huge jobs losses, massive cuts in incomes and an evaporation of confidence. And the nasty possibility of a flu pandemic.
The economic illness that could ensue will likely outlast the impact of the virus. Cutting interest rates and ramping up government spending is insufficient. So is targeting industry assistance with wage subsidies. It's too slow and unwieldy to implement when the crisis is endemic and immediate. People are losing their jobs and livelihoods, here and now.
The most obvious pressure for many people and firms is how to service their debts. We are a hugely indebted nation. If people can't service their immediate debts, things will turn ugly very quickly.
The banking sector is unlikely to provide long term debt relief for the country. They are businesses that are profit driven. They are accountable to their shareholders. They are not charities. Their share prices are already slumping in anticipation of bad debts. They need to survive themselves. Yet their collective actions could sink our economy if they cut their lending and demand people continue servicing their debts. But, for their own survival, they have little choice.
To rely on the goodwill of the banking sector to prevent a nasty downturn is naive. The worst case scenario for New Zealand is a deflationary debt spiral particularly in house prices.
But there are options available to prevent such an ugly scenario.
A key option is a mandatory universal mortgage and business debt holiday. This would only work if the Reserve Bank agreed to provide the necessary monetary package and a guarantee for the banks to ensure their survival. No profiteering, just guaranteed survival until this crisis abates.
Another extreme option could be a temporary nationalisation of the banking system.
Under government directive, they would be required to provide debt holidays for existing debtors but their operating expenses would be funded by the state. This would be a direct provision of relief for many Kiwis. This is not a waiving of debt obligations. Nor is it socialism by stealth. It provides a life-raft for our economy in an extreme immediate crisis. It is a least-worst option. A temporary relief from existing debt burdens during an extreme liquidity crisis.
The current situation differs from the GFC. The GFC was a liquidity crisis in the financial sector. This is a liquidity crisis in the broader economy due to a huge sudden hit to the real economy. Our economy will fall into a deflationary hole if people and businesses are allowed to fail due to their existing debt burdens. This was a key cause of the Great Depression in the 1930s. It is called a liquidity trap.
The amount of money in the economy is hugely elastic. Most of it consists of bank lending. This is largely determined by the willingness of banks to lend and the willingness of people and businesses to borrow.
In the current situation the amount of money and credit in the system is likely to fall quickly. Neither the government nor the Reserve bank can allow this. The quickest way to prevent this is to provide immediate support to existing debt holders through a debt holiday.
Keep the money flowing. Otherwise our economy will head backwards in a very nasty fashion.
• Peter Lyons teaches economics at Saint Peter's College in Epsom and has written several economics texts.