Instead, the IPCC report suggests I'm going to be out there around the clock protecting my retirement enclave with a bucket of water and a stirrup pump, just like in the 1940s, when the Germans tried to torch my possessions with incendiary bombs.
Concerned that my carbon tax contributions are not being used efficiently, I called a government office to inquire how our geophysical efforts to control temperature fluctuations were going.
"Where are my compulsory carbon tax donations being channelled?" I said sternly to a bewildered official. He babbled on about "the big picture" and appeared fuzzy on spending details. When I suggested that perhaps my contributions were being used to fund travel expenses for officials attending further global warming conferences, thereby adding to the greenhouse problem with even more unnecessary air travel, he sidestepped the question and advised me to join an active body monitoring our fragile ecosystem, so I could have a better understanding of that "big picture".
I didn't bother explaining that I've been focused on sustainable energy devices for years, slavishly using those ghastly energy-saving bulbs and installing solar panels, double glazing and insulating walls - not because there's a holier-than-thou little planet-saver inside me, but because it makes economic sense.
This appeals to my tight-wad upbringing as a child, living in an isolated rural property in the North of England that was without running water or electricity, and where even candle wax was recycled.