If you're a financially savvy consumer in one of those states, it's foolish not to buy expensive items online. The addition of sales tax on Amazon in Florida is expected to generate around $80 million in revenue for the state.
This setup sounds nice for consumers, but it's a tremendous disadvantage for physical establishments. There was a time in the early 2000s when e-commerce made up a mere 2 per cent of all retail sales, and perhaps needed a boost from avoiding sales tax; in addition, the savings seemed somehow to make up for the inconvenience of waiting for your item to arrive in the mail.
But today online purchases have soared to 18 per cent of retail sales. And for Amazon, which reported $19.7 billion in revenue in the first quarter, the days of being a small retailer are long past.
Frankly, there also doesn't seem to be a good reason for skipping sales tax on online purchases anymore. Shipping times today are good, and the end result for the customer is the same whether you buy a flat-screen TV at the closest Best Buy or through an online portal - why should the sales tax on those purchases be treated differently?
Read also:
• Online shopping - are NZ retailers adapting to the competition?
• Retailers urged to ride online sales wave
The legal system has hinted it feels the same way. In December, the Supreme Court decided to let stand a New York Court of Appeals ruling that forces online retailers to collect sales tax on purchases in New York regardless of whether they have a physical presence in the state.
"The world has changed dramatically in the last two decades," Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman wrote in the decision, "and it may be that the physical presence test is outdated."
- Slate