"Poor advice provided by some of our advisers between 2003 to 2012 caused financial loss and distress and I am truly sorry for that," Narev said in the statement.
The scandal, which hit both CFPL and the bank's other financial advice business, Financial Wisdom, has already seen CBA dish out "$52 million in compensation to more than 1,100 customers".
But it's all better now. Narev said in the statement the CBA has "transformed" the advice units.
"There have been changes in management, structure and culture," he said. "We have also invested in new systems, implemented new processes, enhanced adviser supervision and improved training."
Despite the recent systems upgrade, there is a general sense that the CBA - and ASIC for that matter - took far too long to address the problem.
And some, including the body that represents about 10,000 Australian financial advisers, the Financial Planning Association (FPA), say the CBA hasn't gone far enough in cleaning up its act.
In a release issued last week, the FPA called on the CBA to "mandate that each and every one of their financial planners must undertake ethics training, commit to no less than 30 hours of professional development per year and sign up to membership of an approved professional association".
While you could view this as an FPA recruitment campaign, the idea that "ethics training" can overcome strong financial incentives is probably naive.
Banks everywhere incentivise their staff to sell products. Perhaps we should all be told what those incentives are, rather than relying on a 'certificate in ethics' to guarantee honesty.