Westpac New Zealand has won a High Court case against a customer who defaulted on Auckland property mortgages, bankrupting her and winning a judgment for outstanding amounts after sales.
Yingqui Zhang borrowed money from the bank to buy 436 Paremoremo Rd near Albany and 159 Hillcrest Rd at Orewa.
But she failed to meet her mortgage obligations, said Associate Judge Owen Paulsen at the High Court in Auckland.
• Westpac refunding $7 million to customers over incorrect fees
• Westpac makes more than half billion in six months after bank focuses on high quality deposits and loans
• Watchdog takes Westpac to court over credit card blunder
• Why Westpac won't be asking what job candidates are paid
Westpac sold the properties but didn't get enough to cover the amount she borrowed so issued bankruptcy proceedings against her.
Zhang opposed the bankruptcy proceedings and applied to set aside the judgment, as well as seeking discovery against it.
She also argued the property sales were not at arm's length because the Paremoremo property was sold to a Westpac client and that wasn't disclosed to her.
The judge said the Paremoremo property was marketed over a five-week period and the Hillcrest property over a four-week period, consistent with marketing campaigns conducted in similar cases.
There is no suggestion that there was anything exceptional about the properties which required longer marketing campaigns, he found.
The properties were extensively marketed by way of on-site signage, agents on-site, and advertisements in property publications, newspapers and on the internet, advertised to the Chinese community and the agents followed up leads in their own databases.
Five members of one family guilty of $2.3 million tax swindle
Kiwi dollar treading water, could gain on further USD weakness
The properties were sold by way of well-conducted tender processes which resulted in competitive tenders for both properties. In both cases, the highest offers were accepted.
The sale prices can be reconciled with, and in fact were better than, the expert opinion of the valuers.
"I am satisfied that Westpac took all reasonable steps to obtain the best possible price reasonably obtainable at the time of sale and that Ms Zhang has no arguable defence to its claim," the judge said.
Her application to set aside the bankruptcy was dismissed, along with where her application to set aside Westpac's summary judgment against her. She did not win her discovery application and was adjudicated bankrupted.