Berlusconi's lawyers in a statement derided the high court's rationale as a mere "collage of earlier decisions." Berlusconi's political aides argued that Berlusconi's rights were violated because the lower court that found him guilty didn't grant his requests for postponements of hearing and didn't allow all the witnesses to testify, among other claims.
The Court of Cassation defended the Milan appeals court's decision, saying Berlusconi's presence in Rome wasn't always essential, and noted that some of the appointments, like a Cabinet meeting, were scheduled after the court calendar had been set.
A lawmaker in Berlusconi's People of Freedom party, Daniela Santanche, urged a Senate panel that must rule on whether to uphold the ban on public office to avoid "mutilating democracy" by refusing to strip him of his Senate seat. The Senate panel will formally consider what to do when it convenes on Sept. 9 and its members will be examining the Cassation's rationale.
Some of Berlusconi's allies have threatened to yank their support for Premier Enrico Letta's government if the media mogul is forced to relinquish his seat. Letta's center-left Democratic Party depends on Berlusconi's party in an unusual and tense coalition of liberals and conservatives. If Berlusconi's ministers quit the Cabinet or his lawmakers refuse to back the government in Parliament, Letta's four-month-old government would collapse even as it struggles to prod Italy out of a stubborn recession.
The Senate panel could also defy the court and refuse to strip Berlusconi of his seat. If that happens, it could be up to Italy's Constitutional Court to decide whether the courts or parliament has the final say in Berlusconi's political destiny.
_____
Associated Press reporter Michele Barbero contributed to this report.