But he said savers should also be aware of the assumptions used by the calculators and consider how it would influence the calculator's result.
"The results of the calculators depend on how each provider has set them up. In particular, the assumptions about what the returns from various investments (like equities and property) will be, looking ahead.
"Some use the forecast returns of different types of funds. A balanced fund calculator will produce different results from a conservative one."
Gregory said investors should see the calculators as a trigger to have a conversation with their provider about whether their existing - or intended - investment was appropriate.
Online calculators have been controversial in Australia where the superannuation industry is much more established.
In 2005 its regulator bought in rules for calculators to stop superannuation providers from using them as a marketing tool to try and attract new members.
READ MORE:
• Kiwisaver: Website gives in-depth fund knowledge
• Is your KiwiSaver fund a dog?
More recently there have been accusations in Australia that some providers are not following the rules and their calculators are misleading people.
Gregory said there were no rules for how calculators should be set up in New Zealand but the fair-dealing provisions in the FMA Act enabled the regulator to intervene when information - including forecast information - was misleading.
"In this case it's just that the calculators are not standardised."
The Herald's research showed a $20k difference in the highest result from a KiwiSaver provider compared to government-backed money education website sorted.
David Boyle, head of investor education at the Commission for Financial Capability, which runs the sorted website said its calculators tended to be on the conservative side.
"At the end of the day we are here to give people a guide.
"It is better to be a little bit more considered rather than taking a true market outcome," he said.