"This means there are circumstances where it generally isn't appropriate for individuals to take photos or make recordings, even where they are in a public space."
The Commissioner found that, just like the filming or photographing of car crashes, it was not appropriate for passengers to film and publish mid-air medical emergencies.
"A medical situation would likely involve sensitive information about an individual who is vulnerable, and so this could be considered highly offensive."
If you wouldn't want someone to do it to you, don't do it to others.
In the Commissioner's view, an incident that may be embarrassing to an airline, such as the case involving United Airlines and David Do, in which a bloodied passenger was filmed being forced off a plane sparking in international outcry against the airline, did not automatically mean it was highly offensive.
Businesses and agencies were governed by a more stringent set of standards laid out in the Privacy Act, meaning it was less likely for it to be acceptable for their representatives to take imagery on a plane.
"Ultimately, all parties should exercise restraint, consideration and common sense on a flight, as they should in other walks of life. If you wouldn't want someone to do it to you, don't do it to others," the Commissioner said.