Yesterday, Qantas published the review, which blamed the company’s reputational crisis on a “command and control” leadership style, and said it was cutting Joyce’s final package to just over half the original amount.
“There was too much deference to a long-tenured CEO who had endured and overcome multiple past operational and financial crises,” said the report by McKinsey & Co senior adviser Tom Saar.
“(Qantas) had a ‘command and control’ leadership style with centralised decisions and an experienced and dominant CEO,” the report added.
“This contributed to a top-down culture, which impacted empowerment and a willingness to challenge ... decisions of concern. That cultural characteristic underpinned some of the events that affected the group’s reputation.”
The Qantas board had “limited visibility or appreciation of the manifestation of this cultural characteristic”, the report noted, adding that the company had already replaced some directors and top managers.
The company was also re-setting its relationships with external stakeholders, the report said, in light of an “adversarial approach to engagement” under Joyce.
And the airline had brought in a stricter internal approval process for chief executive share sales, the report said, noting Joyce’s sale of A$17m ($18.7m) of Qantas shares in June 2023, a few months before his scheduled retirement, contributed to a loss of trust among stakeholders.
Qantas agreed in May to pay A$120 million ($132m) to settle a regulator lawsuit over the sale of thousands of tickets on already cancelled flights.
-Reuters