That legislation passed the House last month but remains hung up in the Senate. It does not include additional language on back pay.
Paoletta’s memo argues that the Government Employee Fair Treatment Act, or GEFTA, and subsequent legislation merely create conditions for Congress to authorise those payments. Lawmakers must also specifically set aside additional money to compensate workers returning from forced leave.
“GEFTA’s directive to pay contingent on the enactment of some future legislation is simply not the type of unconditional obligation that would guarantee, without further action by Congress, that furloughed employees would receive back pay,” the memo states.
Policymakers, including leading appropriators in Congress and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana), had generally interpreted the law in a more straightforward fashion: that new legislation to fund agencies would also automatically pay the government’s employees, whether furloughed or working without pay.
“It is a lucid reinterpretation of the law, but clearly against its intent,” said Robert Shea, a budget expert and former Republican OMB official.
Axios first reported the existence of the OMB memo.
Trump told reporters today that it wasn’t certain that all workers would get back pay.
“I would say it depends on who we’re talking about,” Trump said.
“I can tell you this: The Democrats have put a lot of people in great risk and jeopardy, but it really depends on who you’re talking about.
“But for the most part, we’re going to take care of our people. There are some people that really don’t deserve to be taken care of, and we’ll take care of them in a different way.”
He did not elaborate.
During a shutdown, the White House has broad latitude to determine which federal offices remain open.
Federal employees essential to public safety and protecting government property continue their duties, largely unpaid.
Others are sent home with strict instructions not to work, although some agencies with alternate sources of funding - such as Social Security and Medicare - continue operating.
Roughly 750,000 employees have been furloughed during the shutdown, according to congressional accountants.
Guidance last month from the Office of Personnel Management, which acts as the federal government’s human resources department, to workers and agencies said the 2019 law required the government “to provide retroactive pay for Federal employees affected by a lapse in appropriations as soon as possible after the lapse in appropriations ends, regardless of scheduled pay dates, and subject to the enactment of appropriations Acts ending the lapse”.
Also, multiple agencies have told their workers that they would receive pay once the shutdown ended.
A frequently asked questions document on the White House’s website had said as of September 30 that “both furloughed and excepted employees will be paid retroactively”.
However, the document was quietly amended at the weekend to take out the reference to the 2019 law. The trade publication Government Executive first reported the change today.
Johnson’s website stated that “under federal law, employees are entitled to backpay upon the government reopening”. Today though, the House Speaker signalled OMB’s new analysis may alter that stance.
“It is true that in previous shutdowns, many or most of them have been paid for the time that they were furloughed,” Johnson said.
He added that “some legal analysts that are saying that might not be appropriate or necessary, in terms of the law requiring that back pay be provided”.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) told reporters that back pay was “a fairly standard practice” and that he wasn’t familiar with OMB’s argument.
“My understanding is, yes, that they would get paid,” he said. “I’ll find out. I haven’t heard this up until now.”
Administration officials hope the memo will maximise Republicans’ leverage in shutdown negotiations with Democrats, according to two people familiar with internal talks, both speaking on the condition of anonymity.
Trump and Vice-President JD Vance have threatened imminent mass layoffs of federal employees - from arms of the federal government that Trump called “Democrat agencies” - but have yet to carry out the firings.
Democrats indicated the move might have the opposite effect.
“Honestly, the impact it seems to have had on Democrats here is people kind of digging in their heels harder and not wanting to give an inch to those kind of hollow threats,” Representative James Walkinshaw (D-Virginia) told the Post.
“And the latest threat to not pay furloughed federal workers at the end of the shutdown I think is in precisely the same category. The law is just very clear.”
Sign up to Herald Premium Editor’s Picks, delivered straight to your inbox every Friday. Editor-in-Chief Murray Kirkness picks the week’s best features, interviews and investigations. Sign up for Herald Premium here.