In one recent wargame, imagined by former Nato and German Army officials, Russia invaded Lithuania and achieved most of its goals there within a few days. Narva, an Estonian town near the Russian border, has also been identified as a potential invasion target.
But Tsahkna, who was speaking on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference, said such scenarios were out of date, as the Baltic states had massively increased their defence spending and were more than capable of fighting back against Russia.
“The previous plans of the past were just, ‘if Russia is coming, then Nato finally will win the war’. In that case, no Estonians will be left. So we are not interested about these kind of plans,” he said.
“This is our plan because there is no other plan. We cannot let Russia into the Baltic states and [only] then fight back.”
The Lithuania simulation, which was organised by German newspaper Die Welt, has proven hugely controversial as Russia emerged from it as the clear victor, while Nato was left paralysed with indecision.
During the simulation, the United States refused to invoke Article 5, Nato’s mutual defence treaty, owing to fears it would trigger a third world war. And Germany failed to push back invading Russian troops despite having a brigade stationed in Lithuania.
The simulation predicted that Russia would justify its invasion by manufacturing a “humanitarian crisis”, similar to its tactic of claiming the invasion of Ukraine was launched in support of oppressed Russian-speaking minorities.
During the simulation, Russian troops captured the Lithuanian city of Marijampole before seizing control of the strategically important Suwalki gap.
The wargame’s outcome irritated Baltic leaders as it largely assumed they would be incapable of fighting back against an invading force.
“Such scenarios are, frankly, insulting to frontline countries, which are too often portrayed as passive objects rather than as subjects with agency of their own,” Sven Sakkov, the Estonian ambassador to the United Kingdom, said in a recent post on X.
Gintaras Bagdonas, a retired Lithuanian colonel, told public broadcaster LRT: “What is written there is nonsense. I do not know the objectives of that war game – perhaps they are overly political, intended to show a threat or to educate their own public, German or other European citizens."
Sign up to Herald Premium Editor’s Picks, delivered straight to your inbox every Friday. Editor-in-Chief Murray Kirkness picks the week’s best features, interviews and investigations. Sign up for Herald Premium here.