Britain's Prime Minister Rishi Sunak speaks during a press conference following the launch of new legislation on migrant channel crossings at Downing Street, London, on Tuesday. Photo / via AP
Britain's Prime Minister Rishi Sunak speaks during a press conference following the launch of new legislation on migrant channel crossings at Downing Street, London, on Tuesday. Photo / via AP
The UK government says it is ready for legal challenges to a tough new law intended to stop tens of thousands of migrants a year reaching the country in small boats across the English Channel.
Home Secretary Suella Braverman said the government had “pushed the boundaries of international law”with a bill that will bar asylum claims by anyone who reaches the UK by unauthorised means, and will compel the government to detain and then deport them “to their home country or a safe third country”. They would be banned from ever reentering the country.
“If you enter Britain illegally, you will be detained and swiftly removed,” Braverman told lawmakers in the House of Commons as she introduced the government’s Illegal Migration Bill.
The government says the new law, once approved by Parliament, will deter migrants and hobble smuggling gangs who send desperate people on hazardous journeys across one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said the law would “take back control” of UK borders — a central pledge of the successful but divisive campaign to take Britain out of the European Union.
Visiting a control centre in the port of Dover where officials track Channel traffic, Sunak said “we’ve got to somehow break the cycle of these criminal gangs”.
But critics say the plan is unethical and unworkable, since people fleeing war and persecution can’t be sent home, and is likely to be the latest in a series of unfulfilled immigration pledges by successive UK governments.
“There is nothing fair, humane or even practical in this plan, and it’s frankly chilling to see ministers trying to remove human rights protections for groups of people whom they’ve chosen to scapegoat for their own failures,” said Steve Valdez-Symonds, of Amnesty International.
Braverman said those arriving by boat would be detained within 28 days and then deported, with exceptions only for children, those medically unfit to fly and people at risk of serious harm, and with limited grounds for appeal.
Migrants who were victims of human trafficking would be barred from using Britain’s modern slavery laws to prevent deportation, she said.
Britain's Home Secretary Suella Braverman listens as Prime Minister Rishi Sunak speaks during a press conference following the launch of new legislation on migrant channel crossings at Downing Street, London, on Tuesday. Photo / via AP
Braverman acknowledged the bill is likely to face legal challenges. She said there is a chance the “robust and novel” legislation breaches UK human rights laws. But Braverman said she was confident it is compatible with Britain’s “international obligations” under refugee and human rights conventions.
“In the face of today’s global migration crisis, yesterday’s laws are simply not fit for purpose,” she said.
Britain receives fewer asylum-seekers than some European nations such as Italy, Germany or France. But thousands of migrants from around the world travel to northern France each year in hopes of reaching the UK, drawn by family ties, the English language or the perceived ease of getting a job.
Most attempt the journey in dinghies and other small craft now that authorities have clamped down on other routes such as stowing away on buses or trucks.
More than 45,000 people arrived in Britain by boat in 2022, up from 28,000 in 2021 and 8500 in 2020. Most went on to claim asylum, but a backlog of more than 160,000 cases has led to many languishing in overcrowded processing centres or hotels, without the right to work.
The British government says many of those making the journey are economic migrants rather than refugees, and points to an upswing last year in arrivals from Albania, a European country that the UK considers safe.
Refugee groups say most of the channel arrivals are fleeing war, persecution or famine in countries including Afghanistan, Iran and Iraq. A majority of those whose claims have been processed were granted asylum in the UK.
Britain's Prime Minister Rishi Sunak speaks during a press conference following the launch of new legislation on migrant channel crossings at Downing Street, London, on Tuesday. Photo / via AP
The charities say migrants risk the cross-channel journey because there are few safe, legal ways to reach the UK.
“No one wants to see families continue to risk their lives crossing the freezing channel in small boats,” said Katy Chakrabortty, of charity Oxfam GB. “But instead of implementing this cruel bill, the UK should provide more safe and legal routes for people needing protection.”
The UK government says once its new law is in place it will establish more legal paths to asylum, adding to those set up for people from Afghanistan, Hong Kong and Ukraine. But it hasn’t said how many people will be accepted, or when the programme will start.
It’s also unclear which, if any, safe countries will be willing to take in people deported from Britain. A plan announced by the UK last year to send migrants on a one-way trip to Rwanda is mired in legal challenges. No one has been sent to the East African country, though Britain has already paid Rwanda £140 million (NZ$270 million) under the deal.
Cooperation with France on stopping the boats stalled amid Britain’s acrimonious split from the European Union, though relations have improved since Sunak took office in October. The UK and France signed an agreement in November to increase police patrols on beaches in northern France, and Sunak hopes to cement further cooperation when he meets French President Emmanuel Macron at a UK-France summit on Friday.
Labour Party immigration spokeswoman Yvette Cooper accused the government of “ramping up the rhetoric on refugees” without solving the “deeply damaging chaos” in Britain’s asylum system.
“This bill isn’t a solution,” she said. “It is a con that risks making the chaos even worse.” - AP
