It is “not possible” to identify a child’s father after a woman had sex with twin brothers four days apart, a court has ruled.
A three-judge panel in the United Kingdom said it was equally likely that each brother was the biological father of the child, referred to asP.
DNA testing confirmed the biological father is one of the brothers, but because they are identical twins, the DNA could not distinguish between them.
“Currently the truth of P’s paternity is that their father is one or other of these two identical twins, but it is not possible to say which,” said Judge Sir Andrew McFarlane in a judgment on March 20.
The legal dispute went to court when the mother and one brother (referred to as TP2) sought full parental responsibility for the child.
However, the other brother (referred to as TP1) was registered as the father on the birth certificate and wanted to retain his legal status as the father.
A previous family court judge had refused to remove TP1’s name from the document.
Judge McFarlane said the original ruling was appropriate as you couldn’t declare he wasn’t the father.
That ruling stated: “The failure to prove a fact means that that fact is not proved, it does not mean that the contrary is proved”.
The court said more arguments would have to be heard to establish parental responsibility. Photo / 123rf
While the court decided to keep TP1 on the birth certificate, they decided “any parental responsibility” he acquired from registering as the father would “cease from the date of this court’s order”.
TP1 now remains as the “father” in the birth register entry, but the question of future parental responsibility is a separate issue, said the judgment.
A court in Brazil faced a similar case, when it was impossible to establish paternity after identical twins refused to say which one of them had impregnated the woman, reported the BBC.
The judge said the brothers impersonated each other, to date as many women as possible - then protect themselves from cheating allegations.
