Strickland's technique (powerful short laser pulses) was developed jointly with her PhD adviser Mourou, and is a breakthrough any physicist would envy.
It has myriad far-reaching applications, including in medicine and the fight against cancer.
Some will see this award as a powerful response to the recent polemics that took place at CERN - one of the leading physics institutions - after a male physicist argued at a workshop on equity and diversity that "physics was invented and built by men; it is not by invitation".
CERN issued a statement saying that the physicist was suspended from any activity at CERN with "immediate effect, pending investigation" into the event.
Somehow this male physicist has forgotten that the Emmy Noether theorem, which he uses on a daily basis, was proposed by a female mathematician, Emmy Noether, whose work was critical for the development of what is now known as quantum field theory and particle physics.
So, yes, by awarding the Nobel Prize in Physics to a woman this year, the Nobel committee finally acknowledged the powerful contribution that a woman made, not only to a research field but to humankind.
The 2018 award to a female physicist was long overdue. The list of female physicists who did (and do) deserve the holy grail of scientific recognition is long. And, yes, the list of male physicists who should have got it, too, is also impressive.
But it is striking that only three women have received the physics Nobel since its creation, and that Strickland - at 59 years old and after such a major contribution - is still an assistant professor at her own institution.
Peter Higgs, who was awarded a Nobel prize in 2013 for predicting the existence of the so-called Higgs boson (which was only discovered in 2012, many decades after its prediction), admits he had published a relatively small number of papers in his entire career. Was he an assistant professor? No. He had been promoted to professor of theoretical physics at the University of Edinburgh.
Let us be fair to the Nobel committee, though. Somehow they have now repaired an injustice.
The British astronomer Jocelyn Bell-Burnell discovered a new kind of star (pulsars) but was omitted when her PhD adviser (who had not made the observations but had obtained the funding for the observations) was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1974.
The now Dame Jocelyn was this year chosen by a panel of scientists to receive the US$3 million ($4.6m) special Breakthrough prize in fundamental physics, in part for her work on pulsars but also for a lifetime of inspiring scientific leadership.
There is still a gender gap in physics, and in science in general.
The last decadal plan for physics (2012-2021), released by the Australian Academy of Science, showed women made up only 21 per cent of the staff in physics - that's just one in five.
The Science in Australia Gender Equity (Sage) project notes the widening gap in men and women in senior roles in the natural and physical sciences.
Some data used in those reports is more than a decade old but more recent figures still show a wide gap in the number of men and women in physics and astronomy.
At least now with Strickland's award, a female former PhD student is recognised at the same time as her male then-adviser, Mourou. Perhaps one day, the Nobel prize will be awarded to two or three women physicists, one of whom is a student and the other one their adviser.
For now, we can only hope that by rewarding Strickland with a Nobel prize, the Nobel committee has sent a strong signal to academic institutions about the need to acknowledge the contributions of women in physics properly, and promote them adequately in the same way as their male counterparts for similar contributions.
My take on this: three is a magic number because it signifies a change that hopefully will inspire women and girls to enter the field of physics and make contributions that change human life.
• Celine Boehm, Head of School for Physics, University of Sydney
- This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
