Shim Ki Dae, head of the South Korean hat company Moja Factory, wears a “Make America Shipbuilding Great Again” (MASGA) hat at the company’s office in Seoul. Photo / Jintak Han, The Washington Post
When South Korean President Lee Jae Myung meets President Donald Trump for the first time today, he will arrive at the White House with a gift that’s sure to please Trump: South Korea’s shipbuilding prowess.
Lee, who was elected in June, will arrive for his first summit with Trump at a rocky moment in the relationship between the two security allies, thanks to a transactional United States President who gauges allies by their trade deficit.
South Korea’s is large – US$66 billion ($112b) last year, according to the US Trade Representative – but shipbuilding has emerged as a crucial opportunity for co-operation.
Trump has made revitalising US shipbuilding a priority to try to close the gap with dominant China.
Since his re-election, he has repeatedly raised the prospect of working with South Korea, the world’s second-largest shipbuilder behind China – even as he rails against South Korea for “free-riding” on the US for security.
There are other thorny issues: the Pentagon is considering withdrawing troops from South Korea, and Trump wants to increase the cost to Seoul of stationing US troops in the country.
At the same time, Lee wants a less confrontational approach with Beijing, while Trump wants allies to join Washington to curtail China.
“This is a very challenging time with a large number of important issues, and I’m just keeping my fingers crossed that things will work out between the two presidents,” said Ahn Ho Young, a former South Korean ambassador to the US.
That’s why Seoul has leaned into ships as its most potent – and perhaps only – leverage in dealing with Trump.
Government officials have even dubbed their proposal the “Make American Shipbuilding Great Again” Project, or MASGA.
Moja Factory, a custom hatmaker near Seoul’s Dongdaemun fashion district, rushed to make an order of 10 red caps emblazoned with the phrase “Make America Shipbuilding Great Again,” with an American flag and a South Korean flag, before the two sides announced a bare-bones tariff deal last month.
Initially threatened with a 25% blanket tariff, Seoul secured a 15% levy in last month’s agreement, the same as Japan.
“I hoped the negotiations would go well after seeing how they were preparing for it down to the minor details like creating a hat,” said Shim Ki Dae, head of the factory. The hat “was just a small thing I could do, but I’m glad to see it was used so well in a big way”.
Last week, the factory was working on a new Government order – and Shim has a hunch he’ll be seeing the new hats at the summit.
When the two nations announced the framework of their tariff agreement last month, Lee said the deal included a US$150b fund dedicated to shipbuilding co-operation, though the details remain vague.
Experts said this nevertheless tapped into one of South Korea’s core areas of expertise.
“I think Koreans are very excited because this is the first time that the US has said to Korea, ‘Hey, you guys, can you do something for us?’” said Rhee Shin Hyung, naval architecture professor at Seoul National University.
It may be premature for South Koreans to have “rosy dreams” about where the co-operation is headed, he warned. “I don’t know if it will be the huge jackpot opportunity that people think it is.”
The deal could be mutually beneficial, allowing the nation’s firms to expand into the US defence and commercial markets, and solidifying South Korea as a critical part of the supply chain, according to Hong Jin Hee, senior economic security researcher at the government-affiliated Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
Large-scale projects like expanding production of LNG carriers and warships at US shipyards and collaborating with the US Navy would help South Korea develop its globally competitive track record, Hong said.
Lee is betting it will be beneficial. The South Korean President is scheduled to tour the Hanwha Philly Shipyard in Philadelphia following the summit.
Last year, Hanwha Group became the first South Korean company to acquire a US shipyard, investing US$100 million and bringing high-tech equipment, sophisticated designs and manufacturing know-how to boost production.
South Korea’s shipbuilding industry has flourished since the 1970s, following heavy Government subsidies, and helped shepherd the country’s industrial revolution from postwar poverty.
The fruits of those investments are on full display in Ulsan, home to HD Hyundai Heavy Industries, the world’s biggest shipbuilder, which produces both commercial vessels and military ships for the South Korean Navy.
At its shipyard here, also the world’s biggest, towering orange cranes with names like “Goliath” dot the skyline.
Residents stroll through the Hyundai art park, go to the Hyundai clinic when they’re sick, send their kids to Hyundai middle and high school, drive on the HD Hyundai Construction Equipment Road and cheer for the Hyundai soccer team. No wonder it was once called the “Republic of Hyundai”.
“There was just nothing much here back in the day,” said Park Chan Hyun, 57, who used to work in the industrial sector. Then, auto, energy and shipyard companies burgeoned on the back of cheap labour and government support. “It’s now all Hyundai around here.”
In fact, shipbuilding has thrived across East Asia. China, South Korea, and Japan together account for 90% of the global commercial shipbuilding capacity, according to Rand, a national security think-tank.
In contrast, the US shipbuilding industry has largely been left to rust since the 1980s, when the Reagan Administration ended government subsidies, and now comprises less than 1% of the global market.
The US Navy struggles to build ships on time, on budget and in mass quantities, according to the Government Accountability Office.
And a law designed to protect US shipbuilders from foreign competition has contributed to the ageing of the US’s commercial fleet, according to the Congressional Research Service.
That means the US should lean on allies, rather than going it alone, especially given the level of support the Chinese Government offers to its state-owned shipyards, said Miyeon Oh, Korea chair at Rand.
China now has the world’s largest navy. The scale of China’s naval expansion is “alarming” in its fleet size and how quickly it can build warships, Oh said.
Because of “buy America” provisions in US law and political constraints, it’s not feasible to outsource shipbuilding to allies any time soon.
The US can consider allowing limited co-production with close treaty allies, while still maintaining American ownership and operation, she said. “The US cannot compete with China alone,” Oh said.
Co-ordinating with Seoul and Tokyo allows the US to build servicing capacity in the region in case of conflict in the Taiwan Strait or South China Sea, said Bryan Clark, a former US Navy officer and naval operations expert at the Hudson Institute, a Washington think-tank.
For example, the allies can help with repair and maintenance. US naval ships based in Japan already do almost all of their maintenance there, he said.
“The US is the away team in that fight and ends up having to rely a lot on naval forces to be able to counter Chinese aggression against allies,” Clark said.
On the commercial side, Clark said the US also needs to attract investment from the allies to boost its own domestic production capacity, especially to protect itself from coercive Chinese behaviour like cutting off supply chain and logistics access.
South Korean firms could buy or invest in more US commercial shipyards, replicating the Philly Shipyard model, he said.
South Korean shipbuilders say they stand ready.
“We hope to support the rebuilding and modernisation of the US shipbuilding industry through future co-operation with the US in the commercial marine and defence industries, and together, we can open a new chapter in the global shipbuilding industry,” HD Hyundai Industries said in a statement.
China has taken notice, with the state-affiliated Global Times warning South Korea and Japan last week that co-operating with the US would risk “potentially diverting resources from their own priorities”.
In Ulsan, many residents are not sure more co-operation is necessarily good news. They wonder if ramping up South Korean investments in US shipyards means there will be less focus on the plant here.
“They’re bringing our systems to America, so Ulsan could take a back seat,” said Kang Ji Hyun, 34, who works as a pharmacist across from the plant.
“So if we work more with the US, I think it will hurt our economy.”
Sign up to Herald Premium Editor’s Picks, delivered straight to your inbox every Friday. Editor-in-Chief Murray Kirkness picks the week’s best features, interviews and investigations. Sign up for Herald Premium here.