Lawmakers voted down a measure to compress the timetable to debate the new withdrawal deal, in a rebuke to the prime minister.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson suffered a damaging setback Wednesday in his quest to take Britain out of the European Union, losing a critical vote in Parliament and raising the prospect he might shelve his withdrawal deal and toss the debate over Brexit to the voters in an election.
Johnson's latest defeat came only 30 minutes after his first victory in Parliament. Lawmakers granted preliminary approval to the withdrawal deal he struck with the European Union last week, a major step toward achieving the prime minister's goal and one that broke a string of defeats for him.
But the lawmakers refused in a crucial follow-up vote to put legislation enacting Britain's departure on a fast track to passage, which could have enabled Johnson to meet his deadline of leaving the EU by October 31.
The back-to-back votes captured the one-step-forward, one-step-back nature of the Brexit saga. While lawmakers endorsed the contours of Johnson's plan — something they had never done for his predecessor, Theresa May — they balked at being stampeded into passing the necessary legislation in three days.
The EU will now have to decide how long an extension to grant Britain. Johnson said earlier that if the deadlock slipped into next year, he would rather pull the legislation altogether and face the voters, calculating that he could still win a popular mandate for a swift Brexit.
• What next after Boris Johnson denied vote on Brexit deal?
• Boris Johnson wins key Brexit bill vote but faces another
• UK parliament votes to withold Brexit deal, postponing Boris Johnson's moment of reckoning
• Hopes fade for Brexit deal at summit as EU needs 'more time'
But if the EU offers only a short-term extension of a few weeks, Johnson might well continue battling for passage of his Brexit blueprint, betting that the pressure would increase on Parliament to pass a deal that its members had already shown support for in principle.
Some critics noted that the legislation — which runs to 435 pages including annexes, and would have profound consequences for the future of the country — was going to have less time for scrutiny in the House of Commons than a recent bill prohibiting the use of wild animals in traveling circuses.
On a day that encapsulated both the high drama and recurring gridlock of the Brexit debate, Johnson implored Parliament to pass both the agreement and the enacting legislation by Thursday, calling it the last chance for Britain to make an exit from Europe with a deal in hand.
Vacant: 600-year-old job with top pay. Perks include monarch's bed
Despite litany of failures, Johnson in striking distance of Brexit success
"I will in no way allow months more of this," Johnson insisted at the beginning of hours of heated debate.
"If Parliament refuses to allow Brexit to happen," he said, "I must say that the bill will have to be pulled and we will have to go forward to a general election. I will argue at that election: 'Let's get Brexit done.'"
Whether Johnson is serious about shelving his own deal — or was simply using it as a threat to pressure wavering lawmakers — was open to interpretation. But it made for another day of political theater in the House of Commons, where lawmakers rose one after another to condemn the government's strong-arm tactics or to plead for an end to the endless frustration of Brexit.
"The devil is in the detail," said the leader of the Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn, "and having seen the detail it confirms everything we thought about this rotten deal: a charter for deregulation across the board, paving the way for a Trump-style trade deal that will attack jobs, rights and protections."
Other Labour lawmakers promised to push for a series of amendments to the deal that could act as a kind of poison pill: demanding that there be a second referendum on whether to leave the European Union or putting all of the United Kingdom into the EU's customs union — a provision that helped torpedo May's withdrawal agreement with Brussels earlier this year.
Former allies of Johnson complained about the government's pressure tactics. Waving a doorstop-size bound copy of the bill, Rory Stewart, a member of the Conservative Party who was purged by Johnson after breaking with him on a no-deal Brexit, said, "This is a hell of a big document."
"We cannot pretend" that this is enough time to scrutinise the bill, Stewart said. "This is our Parliament. We cannot do down our Parliament."
The negative vote on the legislation leaves the European Union with a difficult decision because it is almost impossible for Johnson's Brexit deal to be ratified by October 31, the next deadline.
On Saturday, Johnson was forced to request a new delay to Brexit, until January 31, but it is up to the leaders of the bloc to decide unanimously on whether — and for how long — to delay Brexit again.
European leaders share Britain's fatigue with the process and want Johnson's deal to go through. On Tuesday in Brussels, the outgoing president of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, declared that Brexit had been a "waste of time and energy."
But they also want to avert any risk of Britain leaving without any agreement, because that would hurt some fragile economies in mainland Europe, albeit not as hard as Britain's.
Giving Britain a deadline of a few weeks, until mid-November, would put pressure on Parliament to ratify the Brexit deal, but it would be high risk. If lawmakers were unable to agree on the plan, Johnson would be under no obligation to request a further delay, and a "no deal" Brexit could result.
So European leaders might recycle a tactic they have used before and make Johnson a conditional offer: Allow Parliament a little more time if the deal can be ratified — potentially getting Britain out of the bloc quickly — but keep open the possibility of a longer delay if that proves impossible.
When Parliament rejected May's deal for a third time, May requested an extension until June 30. But European leaders offered something different: a delay until June 1 if the British did not take part in elections for the European Parliament — or until October 31 if they did.
May took the second option.
In the current circumstances, a delay until January 31 could allow time for a general election, though Britain would almost certainly need a longer extension to hold a second referendum on Brexit. The difficulty for the European Union is that Parliament has so far agreed to neither of those options.
The fierce maneuvering in the hours leading up to the votes attested to the complex political crosscurrents of the Brexit debate, more than three years after Britons voted to leave the EU.
Johnson lined up support for the deal from a handful of members of the Labour Party, which, along with a solid showing by his fellow Conservatives, put him over the top in the first vote.
Yet he lost support from Stewart and other exiled members of the Conservative Party on the timing of the legislation. That, along with a party-line rejection by Labour members and the Democratic Unionist Party, left him a handful of votes short of securing final approval of the bill by Thursday.
Written by: Mark Landler and Stephen Castle
© 2019 THE NEW YORK TIMES