Ukraine's President Viktor Yanukovych had much explaining to do at the summit meeting of the European Union in Vilnius, Lithuania last Thursday. After six years of negotiation on an EU-Ukraine trade pact and political association agreement which was finally due to be signed at Vilnius, he had to explain why
Gwynne Dyer: Ukraine likely to look west again
Subscribe to listen
EU didn't understand the President's dilemma. Photo / AP
The big Russian bully bit is still true. Moscow has already seen three of its former possessions in Europe - Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia - join the European Union. It sees the future of the remaining six - Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan - as a zero-sum game between Russia and the EU, and it plays hard ball.
Russia has been turning the screws on Ukraine hard, because with 45 million people and a serious industrial base it is the most important of the ex-Soviet states. Ukraine's trade in 2012 was almost equally split between Russia and the EU, but over the past year Russian-Ukrainian trade has fallen by a quarter.
"That's a huge blow to our economy and we can't ignore it," Ukraine's energy minister, Eduard Stavitsky, told the BBC. Stavitsky had asked repeatedly about getting compensation from the EU for the trade with Russia that Ukraine was losing as a punishment for its dalliance with "the west" - but "all we got were declarations that Ukraine would profit from a deal with the EU in the medium- to long-term".
Unfortunately, politicians have to live in the short-term, and Yanukovych's problem (and Ukraine's) is that the country is divided down the middle.
His supporters are mostly Russian-speakers who live in the heavily industrialised eastern half of the country - and those are the people who will really suffer if Russia cuts off its trade with Ukraine.
Yanukovych would not have spent three and a half years negotiating a deal with the EU if he had no intention of ever going through with it. Why bother? He was trying to cut a deal that would satisfy the aspirations of pro-EU voters, especially in the nationalist, Ukrainian-speaking west of the country, without destroying the livelihood of his own supporters in the east.
Either the EU didn't understand his dilemma, or it didn't care. It demanded that he choose between east and west, and made no offer to compensate Ukraine for its big short-term losses if it signed a deal with the EU.
So Yanukovych has put the whole thing on indefinite hold, but that doesn't mean he'll throw in his lot with the "Eurasian Union" instead. If he can ride out the demonstrations that are currently rocking Kiev, then in the longer term he will probably make a cautious return to talks with the EU.
Gwynne Dyer is an independent journalist whose articles are published in 45 countries.